http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/ New York art news and reviews. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-334453 Work of Art Episode 2: Attack of the Clones Recap Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:18:40 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-334453 [...] told they’ll each be expected to produce a coherent exhibition. It’s the same method they used last season, and it’s not a bad one; as the show plays out, you realize it’s actually a pretty great way of [...] [...] told they’ll each be expected to produce a coherent exhibition. It’s the same method they used last season, and it’s not a bad one; as the show plays out, you realize it’s actually a pretty great way of [...]

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-287477 Ratzo Rizzo Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:37:56 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-287477 I like the idea of everyone's blog being both right and wrong. I think 75% of those muscles can be trained not to volunteer their reactions. Also remember that the editing alone can make it appear as if someone was taken aback by another person's statement when in fact it was simply a response to another event. A boring response leads to a bored audience. Head-turning and horrifies looks are a staple in what we call reality television. I like the idea of everyone’s blog being both right and wrong. I think 75% of those muscles can be trained not to volunteer their reactions. Also remember that the editing alone can make it appear as if someone was taken aback by another person’s statement when in fact it was simply a response to another event. A boring response leads to a bored audience. Head-turning and horrifies looks are a staple in what we call reality television.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-322094 Ratzo Rizzo Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:37:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-322094 I like the idea of everyone's blog being both right and wrong. I think 75% of those muscles can be trained not to volunteer their reactions. Also remember that the editing alone can make it appear as if someone was taken aback by another person's statement when in fact it was simply a response to another event. A boring response leads to a bored audience. Head-turning and horrifies looks are a staple in what we call reality television. I like the idea of everyone’s blog being both right and wrong. I think 75% of those muscles can be trained not to volunteer their reactions. Also remember that the editing alone can make it appear as if someone was taken aback by another person’s statement when in fact it was simply a response to another event. A boring response leads to a bored audience. Head-turning and horrifies looks are a staple in what we call reality television.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-287474 Ratzo Rizzo Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:33:18 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-287474 Calling them undies alone warrants some consideration. It sexualizes them in a way that suggests he is innocent of any transgression. That aside I can't figure out why people dislike this kid some much. I think on some level he represents the successful and gentile artist that is far more clever and attractive than we would like to admit. He knows how to control scenarios and has a keen sense of manipulation. He is undoubtedly the most cunning of the bunch or willing to act on his knowledge but is cold in the way he manages to portray himself. I think on some level he tries, and at times fails, to be endearing or to provide some comic relief. Editing could account for much of this I suspect but not all. I like him as the winner for these reasons. I would rather see and hear him than the grumpy naive artist who was recently sent packing. There is nothing more uninteresting than a guy who can't control his temper. A foxy character with or without underwear is much better viewing. On that note I can't tell you how many times I have jumped out of bed to greet Simon De Pury without knowing if I was wearing underwear or not. Calling them undies alone warrants some consideration. It sexualizes them in a way that suggests he is innocent of any transgression. That aside I can’t figure out why people dislike this kid some much. I think on some level he represents the successful and gentile artist that is far more clever and attractive than we would like to admit. He knows how to control scenarios and has a keen sense of manipulation. He is undoubtedly the most cunning of the bunch or willing to act on his knowledge but is cold in the way he manages to portray himself. I think on some level he tries, and at times fails, to be endearing or to provide some comic relief. Editing could account for much of this I suspect but not all. I like him as the winner for these reasons. I would rather see and hear him than the grumpy naive artist who was recently sent packing. There is nothing more uninteresting than a guy who can’t control his temper. A foxy character with or without underwear is much better viewing. On that note I can’t tell you how many times I have jumped out of bed to greet Simon De Pury without knowing if I was wearing underwear or not.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-322092 Ratzo Rizzo Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:33:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-322092 Calling them undies alone warrants some consideration. It sexualizes them in a way that suggests he is innocent of any transgression. That aside I can't figure out why people dislike this kid some much. I think on some level he represents the successful and gentile artist that is far more clever and attractive than we would like to admit. He knows how to control scenarios and has a keen sense of manipulation. He is undoubtedly the most cunning of the bunch or willing to act on his knowledge but is cold in the way he manages to portray himself. I think on some level he tries, and at times fails, to be endearing or to provide some comic relief. Editing could account for much of this I suspect but not all. I like him as the winner for these reasons. I would rather see and hear him than the grumpy naive artist who was recently sent packing. There is nothing more uninteresting than a guy who can't control his temper. A foxy character with or without underwear is much better viewing. On that note I can't tell you how many times I have jumped out of bed to greet Simon De Pury without knowing if I was wearing underwear or not. Calling them undies alone warrants some consideration. It sexualizes them in a way that suggests he is innocent of any transgression. That aside I can’t figure out why people dislike this kid some much. I think on some level he represents the successful and gentile artist that is far more clever and attractive than we would like to admit. He knows how to control scenarios and has a keen sense of manipulation. He is undoubtedly the most cunning of the bunch or willing to act on his knowledge but is cold in the way he manages to portray himself. I think on some level he tries, and at times fails, to be endearing or to provide some comic relief. Editing could account for much of this I suspect but not all. I like him as the winner for these reasons. I would rather see and hear him than the grumpy naive artist who was recently sent packing. There is nothing more uninteresting than a guy who can’t control his temper. A foxy character with or without underwear is much better viewing. On that note I can’t tell you how many times I have jumped out of bed to greet Simon De Pury without knowing if I was wearing underwear or not.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-322093 Ratzo Rizzo Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:33:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-322093 Calling them undies alone warrants some consideration. It sexualizes them in a way that suggests he is innocent of any transgression. That aside I can't figure out why people dislike this kid some much. I think on some level he represents the successful and gentile artist that is far more clever and attractive than we would like to admit. He knows how to control scenarios and has a keen sense of manipulation. He is undoubtedly the most cunning of the bunch or willing to act on his knowledge but is cold in the way he manages to portray himself. I think on some level he tries, and at times fails, to be endearing or to provide some comic relief. Editing could account for much of this I suspect but not all. I like him as the winner for these reasons. I would rather see and hear him than the grumpy naive artist who was recently sent packing. There is nothing more uninteresting than a guy who can't control his temper. A foxy character with or without underwear is much better viewing. On that note I can't tell you how many times I have jumped out of bed to greet Simon De Pury without knowing if I was wearing underwear or not. Calling them undies alone warrants some consideration. It sexualizes them in a way that suggests he is innocent of any transgression. That aside I can’t figure out why people dislike this kid some much. I think on some level he represents the successful and gentile artist that is far more clever and attractive than we would like to admit. He knows how to control scenarios and has a keen sense of manipulation. He is undoubtedly the most cunning of the bunch or willing to act on his knowledge but is cold in the way he manages to portray himself. I think on some level he tries, and at times fails, to be endearing or to provide some comic relief. Editing could account for much of this I suspect but not all. I like him as the winner for these reasons. I would rather see and hear him than the grumpy naive artist who was recently sent packing. There is nothing more uninteresting than a guy who can’t control his temper. A foxy character with or without underwear is much better viewing. On that note I can’t tell you how many times I have jumped out of bed to greet Simon De Pury without knowing if I was wearing underwear or not.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-286272 Eleggua2000 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:58:41 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-286272 Someone should just give Nao her own channel. A show is not enough to conatain her. Someone should just give Nao her own channel. A show is not enough to conatain her.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-322090 Eleggua2000 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:58:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-322090 Someone should just give Nao her own channel. A show is not enough to conatain her. Someone should just give Nao her own channel. A show is not enough to conatain her.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-322091 Eleggua2000 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:58:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-322091 Someone should just give Nao her own channel. A show is not enough to conatain her. Someone should just give Nao her own channel. A show is not enough to conatain her.

]]> http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/07/15/work-of-art-open-to-the-public/comment-page-2/#comment-285214 Peter Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:40:47 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=15504#comment-285214 http://stylembe.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/yabba-dabba-doozy-work-of-art-episode-6/ http://stylembe.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/yabba-dabba-doozy-work-of-art-episode-6/

]]>