Harry Stendhal, owner of Chelsea gallery, stole millions of dollars in art and money from two famous New York artists: lawsuit – NYPOST.com

by Art Fag City on July 13, 2010 · 16 comments

Harry Stendhal, owner of Chelsea gallery, stole millions of dollars in art and money from two famous New York artists: lawsuit – NYPOST.com – Juicey: The owner of Chelsea’s Stendhal Gallery swindled two famed artists to fund his extravagant lifestyle — including paying off a $90,000 bill at Cipriani Downtown, court papers claim. Via: Loren Munk


We Went To Chelsea, Vol. 1	Sanja Iveković at MoMA: That Backward Feminist From Croatia	Gerald Ferguson’s Blue Collar Conceptualism: An Interview with Luke Murphy and Phil Grauer

Pete
Who doesn’t enjoy receiving profanity laced email when money you believe to be rightfully yours is not in the offing. Personally I prefer the silent treatment, that way there’s always the hope that the accused party is aware of their misgivings and may or may not if enough pressure is applied eventually come clean.
Pete
Who doesn’t enjoy receiving profanity laced email when money you believe to be rightfully yours is not in the offing. Personally I prefer the silent treatment, that way there’s always the hope that the accused party is aware of their misgivings and may or may not if enough pressure is applied eventually come clean.
Pete
Who doesn’t enjoy receiving profanity laced email when money you believe to be rightfully yours is not in the offing. Personally I prefer the silent treatment, that way there’s always the hope that the accused party is aware of their misgivings and may or may not if enough pressure is applied eventually come clean.
Pete
Who doesn’t enjoy receiving profanity laced email when money you believe to be rightfully yours is not in the offing. Personally I prefer the silent treatment, that way there’s always the hope that the accused party is aware of their misgivings and may or may not if enough pressure is applied eventually come clean.
Pete
Who doesn’t enjoy receiving profanity laced email when money you believe to be rightfully yours is not in the offing. Personally I prefer the silent treatment, that way there’s always the hope that the accused party is aware of their misgivings and may or may not if enough pressure is applied eventually come clean.
http://www.artfagcity.com Art Fag City
Please don’t spam the blog with links to other websites if the article in question is simply quoting the article we’ve linked to.
http://www.artfagcity.com Art Fag City
Please don’t spam the blog with links to other websites if the article in question is simply quoting the article we’ve linked to.
http://www.artfagcity.com Art Fag City
Please don’t spam the blog with links to other websites if the article in question is simply quoting the article we’ve linked to.
http://www.artfagcity.com Art Fag City
Please don’t spam the blog with links to other websites if the article in question is simply quoting the article we’ve linked to.
http://www.artfagcity.com Art Fag City
Please don’t spam the blog with links to other websites if the article in question is simply quoting the article we’ve linked to.
http://christopherlondonblog.com/2010/07/19/paula-scher-the-map-lady-vs-the-man-who-put-her-on-the-map-in-the-art-world-harry-stendhal/ PAULA SCHER: The Map Lady vs. The Man Who Put Her on the Map in the Art World: Harry Stendhal | London in New York
[...] it was reported in the New York Post and referenced in sorted other blogs, including Scallywag & Vagabond, post.thing.net and Hyperallergic (all of whom merely [...]
http://www.christopherlondonblog.com Christopher London
My belief is that there is far more than meets the eye to this story and is likely about power, control and money and the Plantiff’s use of the media, in particular the hiring of a Wall Street Law Firm is representative of an undercurrent to undermine the stature of the defendant to extract a release from contractual obligations or payments one side is obligated to make to the other. A refusal to speak to the media is not indicative of guilt and repeating of allegations reported is not a conclusive journalistic inquiry. There is a danger in these times to use the media to stain anyone who you are engaged in battle with as some kind of Bernie Madoff.
http://www.christopherlondonblog.com Christopher London
My belief is that there is far more than meets the eye to this story and is likely about power, control and money and the Plantiff’s use of the media, in particular the hiring of a Wall Street Law Firm is representative of an undercurrent to undermine the stature of the defendant to extract a release from contractual obligations or payments one side is obligated to make to the other. A refusal to speak to the media is not indicative of guilt and repeating of allegations reported is not a conclusive journalistic inquiry. There is a danger in these times to use the media to stain anyone who you are engaged in battle with as some kind of Bernie Madoff.
http://www.christopherlondonblog.com Christopher London
My belief is that there is far more than meets the eye to this story and is likely about power, control and money and the Plantiff’s use of the media, in particular the hiring of a Wall Street Law Firm is representative of an undercurrent to undermine the stature of the defendant to extract a release from contractual obligations or payments one side is obligated to make to the other. A refusal to speak to the media is not indicative of guilt and repeating of allegations reported is not a conclusive journalistic inquiry. There is a danger in these times to use the media to stain anyone who you are engaged in battle with as some kind of Bernie Madoff.
http://www.christopherlondonblog.com Christopher London
My belief is that there is far more than meets the eye to this story and is likely about power, control and money and the Plantiff’s use of the media, in particular the hiring of a Wall Street Law Firm is representative of an undercurrent to undermine the stature of the defendant to extract a release from contractual obligations or payments one side is obligated to make to the other. A refusal to speak to the media is not indicative of guilt and repeating of allegations reported is not a conclusive journalistic inquiry. There is a danger in these times to use the media to stain anyone who you are engaged in battle with as some kind of Bernie Madoff.
http://www.christopherlondonblog.com Christopher London
My belief is that there is far more than meets the eye to this story and is likely about power, control and money and the Plantiff’s use of the media, in particular the hiring of a Wall Street Law Firm is representative of an undercurrent to undermine the stature of the defendant to extract a release from contractual obligations or payments one side is obligated to make to the other. A refusal to speak to the media is not indicative of guilt and repeating of allegations reported is not a conclusive journalistic inquiry. There is a danger in these times to use the media to stain anyone who you are engaged in battle with as some kind of Bernie Madoff.