<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Corrected] Wooster Collective&#8217;s Marc Schiller Fails to Disclose Marketing Ties with Banksy Movie</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Doug</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-2/#comment-284351</link> <dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:47:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-284351</guid> <description>It doesn&#039;t seem like Marc learned anything from this debacle, as he&#039;s twittering about Wooster Collective posts he&#039;s written for a USA network blog (http://twitter.com/MarcDSchiller/statuses/19074570637). He fails to mention, both on Twitter and his blog post, that USA is a client of his marketing company, Electric Artists. He is clearly being compensated and not disclosing it. I don&#039;t think it matters if the checks are being written to Electric Artists or Wooster Collective—they&#039;re being cashed the same place.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem like Marc learned anything from this debacle, as he&#8217;s twittering about Wooster Collective posts he&#8217;s written for a USA network blog (<a href="http://twitter.com/MarcDSchiller/statuses/19074570637" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/MarcDSchiller/statuses/19074570637</a>). He fails to mention, both on Twitter and his blog post, that USA is a client of his marketing company, Electric Artists. He is clearly being compensated and not disclosing it. I don&#8217;t think it matters if the checks are being written to Electric Artists or Wooster Collective—they&#8217;re being cashed the same place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-2/#comment-319869</link> <dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-319869</guid> <description>It doesn&#039;t seem like Marc learned anything from this debacle, as he&#039;s twittering about Wooster Collective posts he&#039;s written for a USA network blog (http://twitter.com/MarcDSchiller/statuses/19074570637). He fails to mention, both on Twitter and his blog post, that USA is a client of his marketing company, Electric Artists. He is clearly being compensated and not disclosing it. I don&#039;t think it matters if the checks are being written to Electric Artists or Wooster Collective—they&#039;re being cashed the same place.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem like Marc learned anything from this debacle, as he&#8217;s twittering about Wooster Collective posts he&#8217;s written for a USA network blog (<a href="http://twitter.com/MarcDSchiller/statuses/19074570637" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/MarcDSchiller/statuses/19074570637</a>). He fails to mention, both on Twitter and his blog post, that USA is a client of his marketing company, Electric Artists. He is clearly being compensated and not disclosing it. I don&#8217;t think it matters if the checks are being written to Electric Artists or Wooster Collective—they&#8217;re being cashed the same place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NXX</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-266312</link> <dc:creator>NXX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:38:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-266312</guid> <description>The whole thing is clearly a Banksy/Fairey hoax (and a worthy one).But Marc Schiller is an obvious dilletante that is trying to muscle into the hype as much as possible so when the whole thing breaks JT Leroy style he will be able to say he was totally in on it bc he&#039;s such a fucking art marketing and PR genius.  Hooray for art marketing and PR!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing is clearly a Banksy/Fairey hoax (and a worthy one).</p><p>But Marc Schiller is an obvious dilletante that is trying to muscle into the hype as much as possible so when the whole thing breaks JT Leroy style he will be able to say he was totally in on it bc he&#8217;s such a fucking art marketing and PR genius.  Hooray for art marketing and PR!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NXX</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-319868</link> <dc:creator>NXX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-319868</guid> <description>The whole thing is clearly a Banksy/Fairey hoax (and a worthy one).But Marc Schiller is an obvious dilletante that is trying to muscle into the hype as much as possible so when the whole thing breaks JT Leroy style he will be able to say he was totally in on it bc he&#039;s such a fucking art marketing and PR genius.  Hooray for art marketing and PR!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing is clearly a Banksy/Fairey hoax (and a worthy one).</p><p>But Marc Schiller is an obvious dilletante that is trying to muscle into the hype as much as possible so when the whole thing breaks JT Leroy style he will be able to say he was totally in on it bc he&#8217;s such a fucking art marketing and PR genius.  Hooray for art marketing and PR!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M.Maxwell</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-249728</link> <dc:creator>M.Maxwell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:15:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-249728</guid> <description>This story also reminds me of this marketing campaign that is currently playing itself out on all media outlets. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story also reminds me of this marketing campaign that is currently playing itself out on all media outlets. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M.Maxwell</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-319867</link> <dc:creator>M.Maxwell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-319867</guid> <description>This story also reminds me of this marketing campaign that is currently playing itself out on all media outlets. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story also reminds me of this marketing campaign that is currently playing itself out on all media outlets. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ellen</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-249684</link> <dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:58:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-249684</guid> <description>Even if there is nothing icky about marketing ties, it is simply annoying to all of a sudden have your twitter feed filled with Banksy stats. Especially since Marc is normally a great person to follow!I understand that Marc is a fan, but Banksy is not an unknown at this point and the non-stop tweeting doesn&#039;t help him.As a marketing strategy, it backfired. There is a good chance I would have seen the film, but I&#039;ve really lost all interest at this point.I also think it undermines Banksy&#039;s image. I started to think Marc WAS Banksy. And that Banksy suddenly is really, really annoying on twitter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if there is nothing icky about marketing ties, it is simply annoying to all of a sudden have your twitter feed filled with Banksy stats. Especially since Marc is normally a great person to follow!</p><p>I understand that Marc is a fan, but Banksy is not an unknown at this point and the non-stop tweeting doesn&#8217;t help him.</p><p>As a marketing strategy, it backfired. There is a good chance I would have seen the film, but I&#8217;ve really lost all interest at this point.</p><p>I also think it undermines Banksy&#8217;s image. I started to think Marc WAS Banksy. And that Banksy suddenly is really, really annoying on twitter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ellen</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-319866</link> <dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-319866</guid> <description>Even if there is nothing icky about marketing ties, it is simply annoying to all of a sudden have your twitter feed filled with Banksy stats. Especially since Marc is normally a great person to follow!I understand that Marc is a fan, but Banksy is not an unknown at this point and the non-stop tweeting doesn&#039;t help him.As a marketing strategy, it backfired. There is a good chance I would have seen the film, but I&#039;ve really lost all interest at this point.I also think it undermines Banksy&#039;s image. I started to think Marc WAS Banksy. And that Banksy suddenly is really, really annoying on twitter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if there is nothing icky about marketing ties, it is simply annoying to all of a sudden have your twitter feed filled with Banksy stats. Especially since Marc is normally a great person to follow!</p><p>I understand that Marc is a fan, but Banksy is not an unknown at this point and the non-stop tweeting doesn&#8217;t help him.</p><p>As a marketing strategy, it backfired. There is a good chance I would have seen the film, but I&#8217;ve really lost all interest at this point.</p><p>I also think it undermines Banksy&#8217;s image. I started to think Marc WAS Banksy. And that Banksy suddenly is really, really annoying on twitter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M.Maxwell</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-249650</link> <dc:creator>M.Maxwell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:13:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-249650</guid> <description>This post instantly reminded me of Bill Hick&#039;s monologue about Advertisers and Marketing.http://sennoma.net/main/edits/Hicks.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post instantly reminded me of Bill Hick&#8217;s monologue about Advertisers and Marketing.</p><p><a href="http://sennoma.net/main/edits/Hicks.html" rel="nofollow">http://sennoma.net/main/edits/Hicks.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M.Maxwell</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/04/19/wooster-collectives-marc-schiller-fails-to-disclose-marketing-ties-with-banksy-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-319865</link> <dc:creator>M.Maxwell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=13477#comment-319865</guid> <description>This post instantly reminded me of Bill Hick&#039;s monologue about Advertisers and Marketing.http://sennoma.net/main/edits/Hicks.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post instantly reminded me of Bill Hick&#8217;s monologue about Advertisers and Marketing.</p><p><a href="http://sennoma.net/main/edits/Hicks.html" rel="nofollow">http://sennoma.net/main/edits/Hicks.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 13:29:08 -->
