<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Art Stars Guide Blindfolded Artists: Gelitin at Greene Naftali</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: jacob</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-221325</link> <dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:53:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-221325</guid> <description>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#039;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#039;t see the final performance though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#8217;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#8217;t see the final performance though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jacob</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318756</link> <dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318756</guid> <description>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#039;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#039;t see the final performance though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#8217;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#8217;t see the final performance though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jacob</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318757</link> <dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318757</guid> <description>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#039;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#039;t see the final performance though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#8217;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#8217;t see the final performance though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jacob</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318758</link> <dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318758</guid> <description>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#039;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#039;t see the final performance though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the same way about Spencer Sweeney&#8217;s Theatre Workshop/ rehearsal-as-art exhibit recently at Gavin Brown. I didn&#8217;t see the final performance though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malamapono</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-219721</link> <dc:creator>malamapono</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:18:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-219721</guid> <description>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#039;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp -- symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism....la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.in seeing this, it&#039;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#039;crises&#039; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades -- simply to do it and simply to waste....no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.good night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#8217;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp &#8212; symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism&#8230;.la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.</p><p>in seeing this, it&#8217;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#8216;crises&#8217; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades &#8212; simply to do it and simply to waste&#8230;.no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.</p><p>good night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malamapono</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318753</link> <dc:creator>malamapono</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318753</guid> <description>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#039;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp -- symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism....la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.in seeing this, it&#039;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#039;crises&#039; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades -- simply to do it and simply to waste....no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.good night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#8217;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp &#8212; symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism&#8230;.la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.</p><p>in seeing this, it&#8217;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#8216;crises&#8217; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades &#8212; simply to do it and simply to waste&#8230;.no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.</p><p>good night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malamapono</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318754</link> <dc:creator>malamapono</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318754</guid> <description>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#039;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp -- symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism....la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.in seeing this, it&#039;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#039;crises&#039; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades -- simply to do it and simply to waste....no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.good night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#8217;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp &#8212; symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism&#8230;.la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.</p><p>in seeing this, it&#8217;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#8216;crises&#8217; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades &#8212; simply to do it and simply to waste&#8230;.no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.</p><p>good night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malamapono</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318755</link> <dc:creator>malamapono</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318755</guid> <description>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#039;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp -- symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism....la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.in seeing this, it&#039;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#039;crises&#039; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades -- simply to do it and simply to waste....no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.good night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the arguments being presented, which i understand, remind me of a permanent public exhibit that i saw while visiting different cities.  one in particular (but speaks for the potential malaise in this) had outdoor sculptures noted with signage in braille.  thus, people who could see the work could not read about it, and those who could read about it were unable to see it.  get it?? gotcha, but not really.  hence, a reminder in that as well as the experience, it&#8217;s seems a contradiction compared to organized or structured art or styles making integral statements about social, cultural, or spritual shisms or ?question marks?.  as someone else mentioned with duchamp &#8212; symbolists, dada, surrealism, futurism, modernism&#8230;.la la la. yet, there was a projection not projectile vomit, thus just a mess to clean up, repeat, repeat, delete.</p><p>in seeing this, it&#8217;s yet another reminder of how one considers multiple purported social &#8216;crises&#8217; when creations or presentations are merely messy tapestries, or a loom with a view where guests or participants are free to then snip with scissors, knifes, or other blades &#8212; simply to do it and simply to waste&#8230;.no statement, just redundant platitudes so with ad nauseum it puts nausea to the experience.</p><p>good night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: greg,org</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-219712</link> <dc:creator>greg,org</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:34:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-219712</guid> <description>billy, ¶. ¶, billy.I think the performative element is explicit here. I mean, it&#039;s a stage set surrounded by bleachers.As for the art stars, it&#039;s basically like weekly episodes of Love Boat. Even though it&#039;s incredibly formulaic, the special guest stars add enough novelty to keep people interested week after week.  And so it&#039;s the formula--and the main characters, Gopher et al/Gelitin--who come out ahead.Though it sounds like they all want to be Julie the coked-out cruise director.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billy, ¶. ¶, billy.</p><p>I think the performative element is explicit here. I mean, it&#8217;s a stage set surrounded by bleachers.</p><p>As for the art stars, it&#8217;s basically like weekly episodes of Love Boat. Even though it&#8217;s incredibly formulaic, the special guest stars add enough novelty to keep people interested week after week.  And so it&#8217;s the formula&#8211;and the main characters, Gopher et al/Gelitin&#8211;who come out ahead.</p><p>Though it sounds like they all want to be Julie the coked-out cruise director.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: greg,org</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/02/01/art-stars-guide-blindfolded-artists-gelitin-at-greene-naftali/comment-page-1/#comment-318750</link> <dc:creator>greg,org</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12367#comment-318750</guid> <description>billy, ¶. ¶, billy.I think the performative element is explicit here. I mean, it&#039;s a stage set surrounded by bleachers.As for the art stars, it&#039;s basically like weekly episodes of Love Boat. Even though it&#039;s incredibly formulaic, the special guest stars add enough novelty to keep people interested week after week.  And so it&#039;s the formula--and the main characters, Gopher et al/Gelitin--who come out ahead.Though it sounds like they all want to be Julie the coked-out cruise director.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billy, ¶. ¶, billy.</p><p>I think the performative element is explicit here. I mean, it&#8217;s a stage set surrounded by bleachers.</p><p>As for the art stars, it&#8217;s basically like weekly episodes of Love Boat. Even though it&#8217;s incredibly formulaic, the special guest stars add enough novelty to keep people interested week after week.  And so it&#8217;s the formula&#8211;and the main characters, Gopher et al/Gelitin&#8211;who come out ahead.</p><p>Though it sounds like they all want to be Julie the coked-out cruise director.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 12:21:16 -->
