<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Art, Schooled Schooling</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-218445</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-218445</guid> <description>Clafleche Who&#039;s complaining about Gawker being sarcastic? I think Gawker has produced some pretty witty art related posts in the past. This isn&#039;t up to their par.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clafleche Who&#8217;s complaining about Gawker being sarcastic? I think Gawker has produced some pretty witty art related posts in the past. This isn&#8217;t up to their par.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-318628</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-318628</guid> <description>Clafleche Who&#039;s complaining about Gawker being sarcastic? I think Gawker has produced some pretty witty art related posts in the past. This isn&#039;t up to their par.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clafleche Who&#8217;s complaining about Gawker being sarcastic? I think Gawker has produced some pretty witty art related posts in the past. This isn&#8217;t up to their par.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: clafleche</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-218441</link> <dc:creator>clafleche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:16:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-218441</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry, but the whole post was clearly a joke, so who cares? Everything on Gawker is so tongue-in-cheek that you&#039;d had to be crazy to not realize this. It&#039;s a freakin&#039; gossip website. Nobody at Gawker is forcing people to read it so why should it conform to everybody else&#039;s journalistic standards? Complaining about Gawker being sarcastic is like complaining about oranges for being orange.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but the whole post was clearly a joke, so who cares? Everything on Gawker is so tongue-in-cheek that you&#8217;d had to be crazy to not realize this. It&#8217;s a freakin&#8217; gossip website. Nobody at Gawker is forcing people to read it so why should it conform to everybody else&#8217;s journalistic standards? Complaining about Gawker being sarcastic is like complaining about oranges for being orange.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: clafleche</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-318627</link> <dc:creator>clafleche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-318627</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry, but the whole post was clearly a joke, so who cares? Everything on Gawker is so tongue-in-cheek that you&#039;d had to be crazy to not realize this. It&#039;s a freakin&#039; gossip website. Nobody at Gawker is forcing people to read it so why should it conform to everybody else&#039;s journalistic standards? Complaining about Gawker being sarcastic is like complaining about oranges for being orange.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but the whole post was clearly a joke, so who cares? Everything on Gawker is so tongue-in-cheek that you&#8217;d had to be crazy to not realize this. It&#8217;s a freakin&#8217; gossip website. Nobody at Gawker is forcing people to read it so why should it conform to everybody else&#8217;s journalistic standards? Complaining about Gawker being sarcastic is like complaining about oranges for being orange.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-218378</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:47:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-218378</guid> <description>Thanks for your response Foster. I&#039;ve read all the columns already, but perhaps other readers haven&#039;t.To be clear: I never interpreted Art, Schooled as serious, but I do wish a little more time and thought was put into the column. Deitch building a market for pre-established artists is a factual, not perceptual error, and if it&#039;s a joke -- as you claim -- it&#039;s not funny. It&#039;s absurdity would assume that people know Basquiat&#039;s history, which you readily admit they do not. If the whole the column is supposed to be stupid, that&#039;s fine, just be clear about it. You&#039;ve got a lot of unhappy commenters -- surely that&#039;s not all the fault of a profession that takes itself too seriously.I&#039;m glad Gawker is adding art coverage to the weekend edition but if that&#039;s going to mean anything, the quality of the column needs to improve. Get a few more facts straight, turn a few more good lines, and bring back the quality of writing Gawker was known for a few years ago. If you&#039;ve got the ability to take risks on the weekend, your writers may be the only people who can do this.As for &quot;as far as I know&quot; and &quot;She seems&quot; you&#039;re right - I did hedge that a bit. I spoke to Javier Peres in Berlin this summer and he mentioned he was thinking of shutting down the gallery. I hadn&#039;t seen it open in months after that, and I walked by last week and didn&#039;t see it open. I didn&#039;t call Peres Projects to check so I opted on the side of caution. The point is, that statement was made out of experience, as opposed to say, simply being uninformed. Speaking of which, consider &quot;she seems&quot; a typographical error and replace with &quot;she is&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response Foster. I&#8217;ve read all the columns already, but perhaps other readers haven&#8217;t.</p><p>To be clear: I never interpreted Art, Schooled as serious, but I do wish a little more time and thought was put into the column. Deitch building a market for pre-established artists is a factual, not perceptual error, and if it&#8217;s a joke &#8212; as you claim &#8212; it&#8217;s not funny. It&#8217;s absurdity would assume that people know Basquiat&#8217;s history, which you readily admit they do not. If the whole the column is supposed to be stupid, that&#8217;s fine, just be clear about it. You&#8217;ve got a lot of unhappy commenters &#8212; surely that&#8217;s not all the fault of a profession that takes itself too seriously.</p><p>I&#8217;m glad Gawker is adding art coverage to the weekend edition but if that&#8217;s going to mean anything, the quality of the column needs to improve. Get a few more facts straight, turn a few more good lines, and bring back the quality of writing Gawker was known for a few years ago. If you&#8217;ve got the ability to take risks on the weekend, your writers may be the only people who can do this.</p><p>As for &#8220;as far as I know&#8221; and &#8220;She seems&#8221; you&#8217;re right &#8211; I did hedge that a bit. I spoke to Javier Peres in Berlin this summer and he mentioned he was thinking of shutting down the gallery. I hadn&#8217;t seen it open in months after that, and I walked by last week and didn&#8217;t see it open. I didn&#8217;t call Peres Projects to check so I opted on the side of caution. The point is, that statement was made out of experience, as opposed to say, simply being uninformed. Speaking of which, consider &#8220;she seems&#8221; a typographical error and replace with &#8220;she is&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Melanie Flood</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-218377</link> <dc:creator>Melanie Flood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-218377</guid> <description>BOOM!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOOM!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Melanie Flood</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-318625</link> <dc:creator>Melanie Flood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-318625</guid> <description>BOOM!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOOM!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-318626</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-318626</guid> <description>Thanks for your response Foster. I&#039;ve read all the columns already, but perhaps other readers haven&#039;t.To be clear: I never interpreted Art, Schooled as serious, but I do wish a little more time and thought was put into the column. Deitch building a market for pre-established artists is a factual, not perceptual error, and if it&#039;s a joke -- as you claim -- it&#039;s not funny. It&#039;s absurdity would assume that people know Basquiat&#039;s history, which you readily admit they do not. If the whole the column is supposed to be stupid, that&#039;s fine, just be clear about it. You&#039;ve got a lot of unhappy commenters -- surely that&#039;s not all the fault of a profession that takes itself too seriously.I&#039;m glad Gawker is adding art coverage to the weekend edition but if that&#039;s going to mean anything, the quality of the column needs to improve. Get a few more facts straight, turn a few more good lines, and bring back the quality of writing Gawker was known for a few years ago. If you&#039;ve got the ability to take risks on the weekend, your writers may be the only people who can do this.As for &quot;as far as I know&quot; and &quot;She seems&quot; you&#039;re right - I did hedge that a bit. I spoke to Javier Peres in Berlin this summer and he mentioned he was thinking of shutting down the gallery. I hadn&#039;t seen it open in months after that, and I walked by last week and didn&#039;t see it open. I didn&#039;t call Peres Projects to check so I opted on the side of caution. The point is, that statement was made out of experience, as opposed to say, simply being uninformed. Speaking of which, consider &quot;she seems&quot; a typographical error and replace with &quot;she is&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response Foster. I&#8217;ve read all the columns already, but perhaps other readers haven&#8217;t.</p><p>To be clear: I never interpreted Art, Schooled as serious, but I do wish a little more time and thought was put into the column. Deitch building a market for pre-established artists is a factual, not perceptual error, and if it&#8217;s a joke &#8212; as you claim &#8212; it&#8217;s not funny. It&#8217;s absurdity would assume that people know Basquiat&#8217;s history, which you readily admit they do not. If the whole the column is supposed to be stupid, that&#8217;s fine, just be clear about it. You&#8217;ve got a lot of unhappy commenters &#8212; surely that&#8217;s not all the fault of a profession that takes itself too seriously.</p><p>I&#8217;m glad Gawker is adding art coverage to the weekend edition but if that&#8217;s going to mean anything, the quality of the column needs to improve. Get a few more facts straight, turn a few more good lines, and bring back the quality of writing Gawker was known for a few years ago. If you&#8217;ve got the ability to take risks on the weekend, your writers may be the only people who can do this.</p><p>As for &#8220;as far as I know&#8221; and &#8220;She seems&#8221; you&#8217;re right &#8211; I did hedge that a bit. I spoke to Javier Peres in Berlin this summer and he mentioned he was thinking of shutting down the gallery. I hadn&#8217;t seen it open in months after that, and I walked by last week and didn&#8217;t see it open. I didn&#8217;t call Peres Projects to check so I opted on the side of caution. The point is, that statement was made out of experience, as opposed to say, simply being uninformed. Speaking of which, consider &#8220;she seems&#8221; a typographical error and replace with &#8220;she is&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: littlekhole</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-218370</link> <dc:creator>littlekhole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-218370</guid> <description>OH SNAP.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH SNAP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: littlekhole</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2010/01/25/art-schooled-schooling/comment-page-1/#comment-318621</link> <dc:creator>littlekhole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=12263#comment-318621</guid> <description>OH SNAP.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH SNAP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-12 23:50:01 -->
