<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Digital Technology is Not the End of Artistic Trends</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-209057</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:49:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-209057</guid> <description>This is a good point. I will note though, that although DIY culture extends far beyond the web, we&#039;re really talking digital culture and web aesthetics here. I suggest reading the article I linked to before continuing, as it adds something to the debate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point. I will note though, that although DIY culture extends far beyond the web, we&#8217;re really talking digital culture and web aesthetics here. I suggest reading the article I linked to before continuing, as it adds something to the debate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-318137</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-318137</guid> <description>This is a good point. I will note though, that although DIY culture extends far beyond the web, we&#039;re really talking digital culture and web aesthetics here. I suggest reading the article I linked to before continuing, as it adds something to the debate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point. I will note though, that although DIY culture extends far beyond the web, we&#8217;re really talking digital culture and web aesthetics here. I suggest reading the article I linked to before continuing, as it adds something to the debate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Franklin</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-209055</link> <dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:33:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-209055</guid> <description>Conceptual art can trace its lineage back to a handful of prototypes and disparate examples still represent a common culture. The stylistic variation in DIY is a different sort of thing. Clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.com/images?q=steampunk+case+mod&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these people&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.com/images?q=zines&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these people&lt;/a&gt; are not pulling from the same sources, or even thinking about each other. This is an interesting conversation, but the bed beckons. Good night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conceptual art can trace its lineage back to a handful of prototypes and disparate examples still represent a common culture. The stylistic variation in DIY is a different sort of thing. Clearly <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=steampunk+case+mod" rel="nofollow">these people</a> and <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=zines" rel="nofollow">these people</a> are not pulling from the same sources, or even thinking about each other. This is an interesting conversation, but the bed beckons. Good night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Franklin</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-318136</link> <dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-318136</guid> <description>Conceptual art can trace its lineage back to a handful of prototypes and disparate examples still represent a common culture. The stylistic variation in DIY is a different sort of thing. Clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.com/images?q=steampunk+case+mod&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these people&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.com/images?q=zines&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these people&lt;/a&gt; are not pulling from the same sources, or even thinking about each other. This is an interesting conversation, but the bed beckons. Good night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conceptual art can trace its lineage back to a handful of prototypes and disparate examples still represent a common culture. The stylistic variation in DIY is a different sort of thing. Clearly <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=steampunk+case+mod" rel="nofollow">these people</a> and <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=zines" rel="nofollow">these people</a> are not pulling from the same sources, or even thinking about each other. This is an interesting conversation, but the bed beckons. Good night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-209053</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:27:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-209053</guid> <description>I&#039;ll be honest - I&#039;m not sure about the Add-art thing now. I think the artistic impetus is important to contextualizing the software, but I&#039;m wondering to what extent. Read the Lialina essay though. It answers a lot of your questions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure about the Add-art thing now. I think the artistic impetus is important to contextualizing the software, but I&#8217;m wondering to what extent. Read the Lialina essay though. It answers a lot of your questions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-318135</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-318135</guid> <description>I&#039;ll be honest - I&#039;m not sure about the Add-art thing now. I think the artistic impetus is important to contextualizing the software, but I&#039;m wondering to what extent. Read the Lialina essay though. It answers a lot of your questions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure about the Add-art thing now. I think the artistic impetus is important to contextualizing the software, but I&#8217;m wondering to what extent. Read the Lialina essay though. It answers a lot of your questions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-209044</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:41:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-209044</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re trying to prove at 10:15 pm (why is the time stamp on this conversation relevant)? I wasn&#039;t using conceptual art as a movement that came after rap -- it&#039;s simply an established genre of art making with a shifting form. I think the same can be said of the DIY movement. You have a point with ADD-art, but as I mentioned earlier, I make a distinction here, because it was developed with artistic impetus not as a for profit venture. Finally, The identifiable style I&#039;m discussing has been written about extensively by net scholar Olia Lialina. Her essay needs an update -- it was written two years ago -- but it makes the point pretty clearly I think. Her new book is coming to me in the mail shortly.http://www.contemporary-home-computing.org/vernacular-web-2/In any event - you&#039;re right, most of this stuff is crap -- but that&#039;s the same with anything. We&#039;re really only looking for the 2% that&#039;s worth remembering, and like everything else, we have to look very hard to find it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re trying to prove at 10:15 pm (why is the time stamp on this conversation relevant)? I wasn&#8217;t using conceptual art as a movement that came after rap &#8212; it&#8217;s simply an established genre of art making with a shifting form. I think the same can be said of the DIY movement. You have a point with ADD-art, but as I mentioned earlier, I make a distinction here, because it was developed with artistic impetus not as a for profit venture. Finally, The identifiable style I&#8217;m discussing has been written about extensively by net scholar Olia Lialina. Her essay needs an update &#8212; it was written two years ago &#8212; but it makes the point pretty clearly I think. Her new book is coming to me in the mail shortly.</p><p><a href="http://www.contemporary-home-computing.org/vernacular-web-2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporary-home-computing.org/vernacular-web-2/</a></p><p>In any event &#8211; you&#8217;re right, most of this stuff is crap &#8212; but that&#8217;s the same with anything. We&#8217;re really only looking for the 2% that&#8217;s worth remembering, and like everything else, we have to look very hard to find it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-318134</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-318134</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re trying to prove at 10:15 pm (why is the time stamp on this conversation relevant)? I wasn&#039;t using conceptual art as a movement that came after rap -- it&#039;s simply an established genre of art making with a shifting form. I think the same can be said of the DIY movement. You have a point with ADD-art, but as I mentioned earlier, I make a distinction here, because it was developed with artistic impetus not as a for profit venture. Finally, The identifiable style I&#039;m discussing has been written about extensively by net scholar Olia Lialina. Her essay needs an update -- it was written two years ago -- but it makes the point pretty clearly I think. Her new book is coming to me in the mail shortly.http://www.contemporary-home-computing.org/vernacular-web-2/In any event - you&#039;re right, most of this stuff is crap -- but that&#039;s the same with anything. We&#039;re really only looking for the 2% that&#039;s worth remembering, and like everything else, we have to look very hard to find it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re trying to prove at 10:15 pm (why is the time stamp on this conversation relevant)? I wasn&#8217;t using conceptual art as a movement that came after rap &#8212; it&#8217;s simply an established genre of art making with a shifting form. I think the same can be said of the DIY movement. You have a point with ADD-art, but as I mentioned earlier, I make a distinction here, because it was developed with artistic impetus not as a for profit venture. Finally, The identifiable style I&#8217;m discussing has been written about extensively by net scholar Olia Lialina. Her essay needs an update &#8212; it was written two years ago &#8212; but it makes the point pretty clearly I think. Her new book is coming to me in the mail shortly.</p><p><a href="http://www.contemporary-home-computing.org/vernacular-web-2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporary-home-computing.org/vernacular-web-2/</a></p><p>In any event &#8211; you&#8217;re right, most of this stuff is crap &#8212; but that&#8217;s the same with anything. We&#8217;re really only looking for the 2% that&#8217;s worth remembering, and like everything else, we have to look very hard to find it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Franklin</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-209038</link> <dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:15:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-209038</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re trying to establish at 8:59. Conceptual art predates rap. ADD-art is a delivery platform, like iTunes. I challenge you to identify the &quot;identifiable style&quot; of DIY. ROFLcon and the attendant concerns that you list deal with Internet culture, not art. Not that there is no overlap, but that the overlap isn&#039;t the point. Thus &quot;it will likely be remembered less for its art than for the inventions that put the art into circulation.&quot;What&#039;s missing is a demonstration that any creative trend that can be identified as such, originating in 1990 or later, is capable of presenting a full range of humanistic concerns, or a narrow range with sublime examples, in a lasting manner. The world would be poorer without I Can Has Cheezburger, but we&#039;re not going to get great art out of LOLcats in the way we&#039;ve gotten it out of rap, or abstract expressionism, or film noir, or magic realist fiction, or other artistic phenomena that we can readily name and describe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re trying to establish at 8:59. Conceptual art predates rap. ADD-art is a delivery platform, like iTunes. I challenge you to identify the &#8220;identifiable style&#8221; of DIY. ROFLcon and the attendant concerns that you list deal with Internet culture, not art. Not that there is no overlap, but that the overlap isn&#8217;t the point. Thus &#8220;it will likely be remembered less for its art than for the inventions that put the art into circulation.&#8221;</p><p>What&#8217;s missing is a demonstration that any creative trend that can be identified as such, originating in 1990 or later, is capable of presenting a full range of humanistic concerns, or a narrow range with sublime examples, in a lasting manner. The world would be poorer without I Can Has Cheezburger, but we&#8217;re not going to get great art out of LOLcats in the way we&#8217;ve gotten it out of rap, or abstract expressionism, or film noir, or magic realist fiction, or other artistic phenomena that we can readily name and describe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Franklin</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/12/21/digital-technology-is-not-the-end-of-artistic-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-318133</link> <dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=11727#comment-318133</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re trying to establish at 8:59. Conceptual art predates rap. ADD-art is a delivery platform, like iTunes. I challenge you to identify the &quot;identifiable style&quot; of DIY. ROFLcon and the attendant concerns that you list deal with Internet culture, not art. Not that there is no overlap, but that the overlap isn&#039;t the point. Thus &quot;it will likely be remembered less for its art than for the inventions that put the art into circulation.&quot;What&#039;s missing is a demonstration that any creative trend that can be identified as such, originating in 1990 or later, is capable of presenting a full range of humanistic concerns, or a narrow range with sublime examples, in a lasting manner. The world would be poorer without I Can Has Cheezburger, but we&#039;re not going to get great art out of LOLcats in the way we&#039;ve gotten it out of rap, or abstract expressionism, or film noir, or magic realist fiction, or other artistic phenomena that we can readily name and describe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re trying to establish at 8:59. Conceptual art predates rap. ADD-art is a delivery platform, like iTunes. I challenge you to identify the &#8220;identifiable style&#8221; of DIY. ROFLcon and the attendant concerns that you list deal with Internet culture, not art. Not that there is no overlap, but that the overlap isn&#8217;t the point. Thus &#8220;it will likely be remembered less for its art than for the inventions that put the art into circulation.&#8221;</p><p>What&#8217;s missing is a demonstration that any creative trend that can be identified as such, originating in 1990 or later, is capable of presenting a full range of humanistic concerns, or a narrow range with sublime examples, in a lasting manner. The world would be poorer without I Can Has Cheezburger, but we&#8217;re not going to get great art out of LOLcats in the way we&#8217;ve gotten it out of rap, or abstract expressionism, or film noir, or magic realist fiction, or other artistic phenomena that we can readily name and describe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 09:41:07 -->
