Comments on: Fresh Links! http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/ New York art news and reviews. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Anahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/comment-page-1/#comment-197557 Ana Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:30:38 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/#comment-197557 Re the conflict of interest you allude to, I think you can see that Perry has reviewed other institutional sites in the past, and has been supportive. (See his reviews of SFMOMA.org and the Hammer.) For the most part, I reluctantly agree with his assessment of this effort, which is truly stillborn. I'm frankly surprised that a museum that deals with contemporary art (and by extension, technology and digital culture) would release such an inferior product to the public. Re the conflict of interest you allude to, I think you can see that Perry has reviewed other institutional sites in the past, and has been supportive. (See his reviews of SFMOMA.org and the Hammer.) For the most part, I reluctantly agree with his assessment of this effort, which is truly stillborn. I’m frankly surprised that a museum that deals with contemporary art (and by extension, technology and digital culture) would release such an inferior product to the public.

]]> By: Anahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/comment-page-1/#comment-317916 Ana Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:30:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/#comment-317916 Re the conflict of interest you allude to, I think you can see that Perry has reviewed other institutional sites in the past, and has been supportive. (See his reviews of SFMOMA.org and the Hammer.) For the most part, I reluctantly agree with his assessment of this effort, which is truly stillborn. I'm frankly surprised that a museum that deals with contemporary art (and by extension, technology and digital culture) would release such an inferior product to the public. Re the conflict of interest you allude to, I think you can see that Perry has reviewed other institutional sites in the past, and has been supportive. (See his reviews of SFMOMA.org and the Hammer.) For the most part, I reluctantly agree with his assessment of this effort, which is truly stillborn. I’m frankly surprised that a museum that deals with contemporary art (and by extension, technology and digital culture) would release such an inferior product to the public.

]]> By: Perry Garvinhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/comment-page-1/#comment-197264 Perry Garvin Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:47:32 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/#comment-197264 Ah - I should have mentioned that. Blog post updated!Thanks,Perry Ah – I should have mentioned that. Blog post updated!

Thanks,

Perry

]]> By: Perry Garvinhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/comment-page-1/#comment-317915 Perry Garvin Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:47:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/11/13/fresh-links-1789/#comment-317915 Ah - I should have mentioned that. Blog post updated!Thanks,Perry Ah – I should have mentioned that. Blog post updated!

Thanks,

Perry

]]>