<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Do You See What I See? No. Good.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/08/24/do-you-see-what-i-see-no-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/08/24/do-you-see-what-i-see-no-good/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Karen Archey</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/08/24/do-you-see-what-i-see-no-good/comment-page-1/#comment-171813</link> <dc:creator>Karen Archey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=9384#comment-171813</guid> <description>You&#039;re right to complain that the artist&#039;s name and gallery info were missing, which I updated. However, it&#039;s funny this is the main complaint of a post otherwise full of art historical facts. It&#039;s a pretty contentious piece I expect mixed feedback from and a far cry from &quot;art criticism.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right to complain that the artist&#8217;s name and gallery info were missing, which I updated. However, it&#8217;s funny this is the main complaint of a post otherwise full of art historical facts. It&#8217;s a pretty contentious piece I expect mixed feedback from and a far cry from &#8220;art criticism.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karen Archey</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/08/24/do-you-see-what-i-see-no-good/comment-page-1/#comment-317252</link> <dc:creator>Karen Archey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=9384#comment-317252</guid> <description>You&#039;re right to complain that the artist&#039;s name and gallery info were missing, which I updated. However, it&#039;s funny this is the main complaint of a post otherwise full of art historical facts. It&#039;s a pretty contentious piece I expect mixed feedback from and a far cry from &quot;art criticism.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right to complain that the artist&#8217;s name and gallery info were missing, which I updated. However, it&#8217;s funny this is the main complaint of a post otherwise full of art historical facts. It&#8217;s a pretty contentious piece I expect mixed feedback from and a far cry from &#8220;art criticism.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Manzoni</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/08/24/do-you-see-what-i-see-no-good/comment-page-1/#comment-171801</link> <dc:creator>Manzoni</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:03:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=9384#comment-171801</guid> <description>what&#039;s up with your petty attacks on this critic?  Its certainly not the most objective well written article, but AFC is one to talk with that dog of a post by Karen Archey, &quot;A Brief History of Combining Crap with Crap.&quot;  What&#039;s the point - some art sucks and we don&#039;t even bother to write the artists&#039; names down because we&#039;re not journalists, we&#039;re bloggers?  yuck.  You all should try to up the ante on your own writing before get down on others.  I&#039;ve read strong, well thought out criticism on this blog before, but quite frankly the crap article was low level art criticism and your attacks are not well received by at least one of your readers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s up with your petty attacks on this critic?  Its certainly not the most objective well written article, but AFC is one to talk with that dog of a post by Karen Archey, &#8220;A Brief History of Combining Crap with Crap.&#8221;  What&#8217;s the point &#8211; some art sucks and we don&#8217;t even bother to write the artists&#8217; names down because we&#8217;re not journalists, we&#8217;re bloggers?  yuck.  You all should try to up the ante on your own writing before get down on others.  I&#8217;ve read strong, well thought out criticism on this blog before, but quite frankly the crap article was low level art criticism and your attacks are not well received by at least one of your readers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Manzoni</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/08/24/do-you-see-what-i-see-no-good/comment-page-1/#comment-317251</link> <dc:creator>Manzoni</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=9384#comment-317251</guid> <description>what&#039;s up with your petty attacks on this critic?  Its certainly not the most objective well written article, but AFC is one to talk with that dog of a post by Karen Archey, &quot;A Brief History of Combining Crap with Crap.&quot;  What&#039;s the point - some art sucks and we don&#039;t even bother to write the artists&#039; names down because we&#039;re not journalists, we&#039;re bloggers?  yuck.  You all should try to up the ante on your own writing before get down on others.  I&#039;ve read strong, well thought out criticism on this blog before, but quite frankly the crap article was low level art criticism and your attacks are not well received by at least one of your readers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s up with your petty attacks on this critic?  Its certainly not the most objective well written article, but AFC is one to talk with that dog of a post by Karen Archey, &#8220;A Brief History of Combining Crap with Crap.&#8221;  What&#8217;s the point &#8211; some art sucks and we don&#8217;t even bother to write the artists&#8217; names down because we&#8217;re not journalists, we&#8217;re bloggers?  yuck.  You all should try to up the ante on your own writing before get down on others.  I&#8217;ve read strong, well thought out criticism on this blog before, but quite frankly the crap article was low level art criticism and your attacks are not well received by at least one of your readers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 05:25:46 -->
