Comments on: Another Post About Twitter http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/ New York art news and reviews. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: TWITTER..IS THIS STARTING TO COOL OFF FOR MSNBC? « Jfkfan’s Bloghttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-145363 TWITTER..IS THIS STARTING TO COOL OFF FOR MSNBC? « Jfkfan’s Blog Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:50:28 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-145363 [...] hasn’t stopped the increasing number of you from telling us — in 140 characters or less. As Johnson aptly summarizes in her blog, Twitter “isn’t just a Web app, it’s a search engine … a filter… a headline [...] [...] hasn’t stopped the increasing number of you from telling us — in 140 characters or less. As Johnson aptly summarizes in her blog, Twitter “isn’t just a Web app, it’s a search engine … a filter… a headline [...]

]]> By: Wickhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-143246 Wick Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:27:24 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-143246 If it were 1997 I might understand the twitter technical merit. However, it's 2009. Just about everything "web 2.0" is laughable and hardly any sort of technical advancement.Pretty sure I'd rather have a nostalgic brick phone than an iPhone anyday. If it were 1997 I might understand the twitter technical merit. However, it’s 2009. Just about everything “web 2.0″ is laughable and hardly any sort of technical advancement.

Pretty sure I’d rather have a nostalgic brick phone than an iPhone anyday.

]]> By: Wickhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-315573 Wick Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:27:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-315573 If it were 1997 I might understand the twitter technical merit. However, it's 2009. Just about everything "web 2.0" is laughable and hardly any sort of technical advancement.Pretty sure I'd rather have a nostalgic brick phone than an iPhone anyday. If it were 1997 I might understand the twitter technical merit. However, it’s 2009. Just about everything “web 2.0″ is laughable and hardly any sort of technical advancement.

Pretty sure I’d rather have a nostalgic brick phone than an iPhone anyday.

]]> By: Sharat Jaswal on Titter - Sharat Jaswalhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-138152 Sharat Jaswal on Titter - Sharat Jaswal Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:58:07 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-138152 [...] people who thought about on same lines and ended up visiting ArtFagCity.com weblog wherein i found this post on [...] [...] people who thought about on same lines and ended up visiting ArtFagCity.com weblog wherein i found this post on [...]

]]> By: MSNBC Hates Twitter | Daily Debriefhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-137688 MSNBC Hates Twitter | Daily Debrief Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:37:56 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-137688 [...] hasn’t stopped the increasing number of you from telling us — in 140 characters or less. As Johnson aptly summarizes in her blog, Twitter “isn’t just a Web app, it’s a search engine … a filter… a [...] [...] hasn’t stopped the increasing number of you from telling us — in 140 characters or less. As Johnson aptly summarizes in her blog, Twitter “isn’t just a Web app, it’s a search engine … a filter… a [...]

]]> By: MSNBC Hates Twitter | InfoAddicthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-137650 MSNBC Hates Twitter | InfoAddict Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:47:44 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-137650 [...] hasn’t stopped the increasing number of you from telling us — in 140 characters or less. As Johnson aptly summarizes in her blog, Twitter “isn’t just a Web app, it’s a search engine … a filter… a [...] [...] hasn’t stopped the increasing number of you from telling us — in 140 characters or less. As Johnson aptly summarizes in her blog, Twitter “isn’t just a Web app, it’s a search engine … a filter… a [...]

]]> By: heather r.http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-135261 heather r. Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:31:27 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-135261 "In fact, I would go so far to say that its short hand will likely change written English"I would even venture to say that Twitter will have a lasting effect on the way we interpret and talk about the world around us, every day.In my clutch of techie friends, things are rather explicitly classified as Twitter-worthy or not-Twitter-worthy. When, for instance, a clever phrase is said during a conversation, it often gets posted to Twitter on the spot. This act is announced to the group so we can all be aware and agree that, yes, that was in fact a Twitter-worthy moment. Events, conversations, and even objects are evaluated based on whether they are appropriate for being broadcast to a group of a few hundred followers, in 140 characters or less.There are lots of implications here on what types of events and moments will get amplified, and which will get lost -- not just on Twitter, but in our lives. Plenty of beautiful, thoughtful, wonderful things aren't Twitter-worthy because there's just not enough room to explain them there. Will a few years of continuous tweeting dull our ability to appreciate them? I'm curious, and a little scared, to find out. “In fact, I would go so far to say that its short hand will likely change written English”

I would even venture to say that Twitter will have a lasting effect on the way we interpret and talk about the world around us, every day.

In my clutch of techie friends, things are rather explicitly classified as Twitter-worthy or not-Twitter-worthy. When, for instance, a clever phrase is said during a conversation, it often gets posted to Twitter on the spot. This act is announced to the group so we can all be aware and agree that, yes, that was in fact a Twitter-worthy moment. Events, conversations, and even objects are evaluated based on whether they are appropriate for being broadcast to a group of a few hundred followers, in 140 characters or less.

There are lots of implications here on what types of events and moments will get amplified, and which will get lost — not just on Twitter, but in our lives. Plenty of beautiful, thoughtful, wonderful things aren’t Twitter-worthy because there’s just not enough room to explain them there. Will a few years of continuous tweeting dull our ability to appreciate them? I’m curious, and a little scared, to find out.

]]> By: heather r.http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-315571 heather r. Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:31:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-315571 "In fact, I would go so far to say that its short hand will likely change written English"I would even venture to say that Twitter will have a lasting effect on the way we interpret and talk about the world around us, every day.In my clutch of techie friends, things are rather explicitly classified as Twitter-worthy or not-Twitter-worthy. When, for instance, a clever phrase is said during a conversation, it often gets posted to Twitter on the spot. This act is announced to the group so we can all be aware and agree that, yes, that was in fact a Twitter-worthy moment. Events, conversations, and even objects are evaluated based on whether they are appropriate for being broadcast to a group of a few hundred followers, in 140 characters or less.There are lots of implications here on what types of events and moments will get amplified, and which will get lost -- not just on Twitter, but in our lives. Plenty of beautiful, thoughtful, wonderful things aren't Twitter-worthy because there's just not enough room to explain them there. Will a few years of continuous tweeting dull our ability to appreciate them? I'm curious, and a little scared, to find out. “In fact, I would go so far to say that its short hand will likely change written English”

I would even venture to say that Twitter will have a lasting effect on the way we interpret and talk about the world around us, every day.

In my clutch of techie friends, things are rather explicitly classified as Twitter-worthy or not-Twitter-worthy. When, for instance, a clever phrase is said during a conversation, it often gets posted to Twitter on the spot. This act is announced to the group so we can all be aware and agree that, yes, that was in fact a Twitter-worthy moment. Events, conversations, and even objects are evaluated based on whether they are appropriate for being broadcast to a group of a few hundred followers, in 140 characters or less.

There are lots of implications here on what types of events and moments will get amplified, and which will get lost — not just on Twitter, but in our lives. Plenty of beautiful, thoughtful, wonderful things aren’t Twitter-worthy because there’s just not enough room to explain them there. Will a few years of continuous tweeting dull our ability to appreciate them? I’m curious, and a little scared, to find out.

]]> By: heather r.http://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-315572 heather r. Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:31:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-315572 "In fact, I would go so far to say that its short hand will likely change written English"I would even venture to say that Twitter will have a lasting effect on the way we interpret and talk about the world around us, every day.In my clutch of techie friends, things are rather explicitly classified as Twitter-worthy or not-Twitter-worthy. When, for instance, a clever phrase is said during a conversation, it often gets posted to Twitter on the spot. This act is announced to the group so we can all be aware and agree that, yes, that was in fact a Twitter-worthy moment. Events, conversations, and even objects are evaluated based on whether they are appropriate for being broadcast to a group of a few hundred followers, in 140 characters or less.There are lots of implications here on what types of events and moments will get amplified, and which will get lost -- not just on Twitter, but in our lives. Plenty of beautiful, thoughtful, wonderful things aren't Twitter-worthy because there's just not enough room to explain them there. Will a few years of continuous tweeting dull our ability to appreciate them? I'm curious, and a little scared, to find out. “In fact, I would go so far to say that its short hand will likely change written English”

I would even venture to say that Twitter will have a lasting effect on the way we interpret and talk about the world around us, every day.

In my clutch of techie friends, things are rather explicitly classified as Twitter-worthy or not-Twitter-worthy. When, for instance, a clever phrase is said during a conversation, it often gets posted to Twitter on the spot. This act is announced to the group so we can all be aware and agree that, yes, that was in fact a Twitter-worthy moment. Events, conversations, and even objects are evaluated based on whether they are appropriate for being broadcast to a group of a few hundred followers, in 140 characters or less.

There are lots of implications here on what types of events and moments will get amplified, and which will get lost — not just on Twitter, but in our lives. Plenty of beautiful, thoughtful, wonderful things aren’t Twitter-worthy because there’s just not enough room to explain them there. Will a few years of continuous tweeting dull our ability to appreciate them? I’m curious, and a little scared, to find out.

]]> By: Art Fag Cityhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2009/02/20/another-post-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-134825 Art Fag City Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:54:18 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/?p=5124#comment-134825 @Leah Funny, I too find there a tension between what I put on my blog vrs what I write elsewhere, but the blog often precedence.@Tom Twitter's slowly replacing my RSS feed, so I definitely use it for info. As you said though, the strings of conversations people have with those you aren't following are basically meaningless. @Leah Funny, I too find there a tension between what I put on my blog vrs what I write elsewhere, but the blog often precedence.

@Tom Twitter’s slowly replacing my RSS feed, so I definitely use it for info. As you said though, the strings of conversations people have with those you aren’t following are basically meaningless.

]]>