<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Refresher:  Why Art Isn&#8217;t A Great Long Term Investment</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Shane</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-111418</link> <dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:02:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-111418</guid> <description>I disagree with the thrust of this editorial.  In these economic climates, it is a total CRAPSHOOT as to what investments hold value.  I would have to think that even &#039;marginal&#039;(I don;t care for the semantic argument, thanks) artists that can maintain a productive career in this day and age can manifest decent prices.  And on the other side of the coin, if dumbass investors are flocking to the next safe haven, why NOT art?  Artists should cash in while the iron is hot.  To think that Art has become a commodity to invest in should attract just the right amount of naive old-school money to line a few deserving pockets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the thrust of this editorial.  In these economic climates, it is a total CRAPSHOOT as to what investments hold value.  I would have to think that even &#8216;marginal&#8217;(I don;t care for the semantic argument, thanks) artists that can maintain a productive career in this day and age can manifest decent prices.  And on the other side of the coin, if dumbass investors are flocking to the next safe haven, why NOT art?  Artists should cash in while the iron is hot.  To think that Art has become a commodity to invest in should attract just the right amount of naive old-school money to line a few deserving pockets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shane</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-314719</link> <dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-314719</guid> <description>I disagree with the thrust of this editorial.  In these economic climates, it is a total CRAPSHOOT as to what investments hold value.  I would have to think that even &#039;marginal&#039;(I don;t care for the semantic argument, thanks) artists that can maintain a productive career in this day and age can manifest decent prices.  And on the other side of the coin, if dumbass investors are flocking to the next safe haven, why NOT art?  Artists should cash in while the iron is hot.  To think that Art has become a commodity to invest in should attract just the right amount of naive old-school money to line a few deserving pockets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the thrust of this editorial.  In these economic climates, it is a total CRAPSHOOT as to what investments hold value.  I would have to think that even &#8216;marginal&#8217;(I don;t care for the semantic argument, thanks) artists that can maintain a productive career in this day and age can manifest decent prices.  And on the other side of the coin, if dumbass investors are flocking to the next safe haven, why NOT art?  Artists should cash in while the iron is hot.  To think that Art has become a commodity to invest in should attract just the right amount of naive old-school money to line a few deserving pockets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shane</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-314720</link> <dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-314720</guid> <description>I disagree with the thrust of this editorial.  In these economic climates, it is a total CRAPSHOOT as to what investments hold value.  I would have to think that even &#039;marginal&#039;(I don;t care for the semantic argument, thanks) artists that can maintain a productive career in this day and age can manifest decent prices.  And on the other side of the coin, if dumbass investors are flocking to the next safe haven, why NOT art?  Artists should cash in while the iron is hot.  To think that Art has become a commodity to invest in should attract just the right amount of naive old-school money to line a few deserving pockets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the thrust of this editorial.  In these economic climates, it is a total CRAPSHOOT as to what investments hold value.  I would have to think that even &#8216;marginal&#8217;(I don;t care for the semantic argument, thanks) artists that can maintain a productive career in this day and age can manifest decent prices.  And on the other side of the coin, if dumbass investors are flocking to the next safe haven, why NOT art?  Artists should cash in while the iron is hot.  To think that Art has become a commodity to invest in should attract just the right amount of naive old-school money to line a few deserving pockets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas Forrest</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-110107</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas Forrest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:35:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-110107</guid> <description>People seem to think that in order for art to be a good investment a majority of works on the market need to have experienced a significant increase in value which is never going to be the case.  Art is a good investment when chosen correctly and when approached correctly.  If this wasn&#039;t the case then there wouldn&#039;t be 30 odd art investment funds returning around 10-15% per annum to their investors.  Investing in art successfully is not as easy as some people would make out which causes problems when so many people go into the art market with an incorrect impression and false expectations of art as an investmentNicholas Forrest http://www.artmarketblog.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to think that in order for art to be a good investment a majority of works on the market need to have experienced a significant increase in value which is never going to be the case.  Art is a good investment when chosen correctly and when approached correctly.  If this wasn&#8217;t the case then there wouldn&#8217;t be 30 odd art investment funds returning around 10-15% per annum to their investors.  Investing in art successfully is not as easy as some people would make out which causes problems when so many people go into the art market with an incorrect impression and false expectations of art as an investment</p><p>Nicholas Forrest<br /> <a href="http://www.artmarketblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.artmarketblog.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas Forrest</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-314718</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas Forrest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-314718</guid> <description>People seem to think that in order for art to be a good investment a majority of works on the market need to have experienced a significant increase in value which is never going to be the case.  Art is a good investment when chosen correctly and when approached correctly.  If this wasn&#039;t the case then there wouldn&#039;t be 30 odd art investment funds returning around 10-15% per annum to their investors.  Investing in art successfully is not as easy as some people would make out which causes problems when so many people go into the art market with an incorrect impression and false expectations of art as an investmentNicholas Forrest http://www.artmarketblog.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to think that in order for art to be a good investment a majority of works on the market need to have experienced a significant increase in value which is never going to be the case.  Art is a good investment when chosen correctly and when approached correctly.  If this wasn&#8217;t the case then there wouldn&#8217;t be 30 odd art investment funds returning around 10-15% per annum to their investors.  Investing in art successfully is not as easy as some people would make out which causes problems when so many people go into the art market with an incorrect impression and false expectations of art as an investment</p><p>Nicholas Forrest<br /> <a href="http://www.artmarketblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.artmarketblog.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-109642</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-109642</guid> <description>The comment didn&#039;t suggest that she was, only the similarity between the two slogans.  Interestingly however, over the weekend I saw the Gilbert &amp; George show at the Brooklyn Museum and noted that they self publish their books under the publishing house name Art for All.  Given that myartdeco.com is an English outfit, I suspect it&#039;s more likely they borrowed the slogan from the duo. Kudos to them if that&#039;s the case, as it&#039;s a remarkably good reference, what with the pair&#039;s mantra of making accessible art.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment didn&#8217;t suggest that she was, only the similarity between the two slogans.  Interestingly however, over the weekend I saw the Gilbert &#038; George show at the Brooklyn Museum and noted that they self publish their books under the publishing house name Art for All.  Given that myartdeco.com is an English outfit, I suspect it&#8217;s more likely they borrowed the slogan from the duo. Kudos to them if that&#8217;s the case, as it&#8217;s a remarkably good reference, what with the pair&#8217;s mantra of making accessible art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-314717</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-314717</guid> <description>The comment didn&#039;t suggest that she was, only the similarity between the two slogans.  Interestingly however, over the weekend I saw the Gilbert &amp; George show at the Brooklyn Museum and noted that they self publish their books under the publishing house name Art for All.  Given that myartdeco.com is an English outfit, I suspect it&#039;s more likely they borrowed the slogan from the duo. Kudos to them if that&#039;s the case, as it&#039;s a remarkably good reference, what with the pair&#039;s mantra of making accessible art.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment didn&#8217;t suggest that she was, only the similarity between the two slogans.  Interestingly however, over the weekend I saw the Gilbert &amp; George show at the Brooklyn Museum and noted that they self publish their books under the publishing house name Art for All.  Given that myartdeco.com is an English outfit, I suspect it&#8217;s more likely they borrowed the slogan from the duo. Kudos to them if that&#8217;s the case, as it&#8217;s a remarkably good reference, what with the pair&#8217;s mantra of making accessible art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: reportage</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-109635</link> <dc:creator>reportage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:30:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-109635</guid> <description>jen bekman was surely not the first person to realize that prints can be made on a mass scale cheaply to allow everyone access to decent art.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jen bekman was surely not the first person to realize that prints can be made on a mass scale cheaply to allow everyone access to decent art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: reportage</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-314716</link> <dc:creator>reportage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-314716</guid> <description>jen bekman was surely not the first person to realize that prints can be made on a mass scale cheaply to allow everyone access to decent art.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jen bekman was surely not the first person to realize that prints can be made on a mass scale cheaply to allow everyone access to decent art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-108551</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:25:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/10/17/refresher-why-art-isnt-a-great-long-term-investment/#comment-108551</guid> <description>You mentioned on another comment thread that you were also a curator at one point.  Was there overlap in those careers?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mentioned on another comment thread that you were also a curator at one point.  Was there overlap in those careers?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 09:33:19 -->
