On account of the fact that I’m no Banksy fan, I’m a little slow on the story Gothamist broke yesterday about his new billboards in New York. For anyone who cares to run out and see them there’s one at the corner of Houston and Macdougal, and another on Canal and West Broadway. Apparently the one on Houston indicates an upcoming show–who knows when.
Banksy had this to say to Gothamist about his billboards, “I wanted to play the corporations at their own game, at the same scale and in the same locations. The advantage of billboard companies is that they'll let you write anything for money, even if what you write is questioning the ethics of letting someone write anything because they have money.”
Amazing! Subversive! And what a trail blazer! Who could have predicted artists would use billboards as a means of critical expression?
As Regina Hackett points out this comment is unfair because it enlists Banksy in an argument he’s not having. I have removed it accordingly.
{ 28 comments }
Yeah, the more popular he gets the more obvious it becomes that he’s a not very smart artist.
Still, I enjoyed the Banksy that used to grace MTAA’s studio building in the burg. But now we have a big Obama poster 🙂
Yeah, the more popular he gets the more obvious it becomes that he’s a not very smart artist.
Still, I enjoyed the Banksy that used to grace MTAA’s studio building in the burg. But now we have a big Obama poster 🙂
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27822510@N00/2657864179/in/photostream/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27822510@N00/2657864179/in/photostream/
Your opinions of him aside, Banksy adds a level of self-refernce that isn’t found in the feminist billboard examples you link to. He isn’t making a statement on a billboard, he’s making it about billboards as well. I don’t think his mission resembles that of the other artists linked to.
Your opinions of him aside, Banksy adds a level of self-refernce that isn’t found in the feminist billboard examples you link to. He isn’t making a statement on a billboard, he’s making it about billboards as well. I don’t think his mission resembles that of the other artists linked to.
You don’t think Jenny Holzer’s use of billboards also speaks to how they are used? I don’t buy that at all.
You don’t think Jenny Holzer’s use of billboards also speaks to how they are used? I don’t buy that at all.
OK, I’ll play, here’s my fave artist billboard: Corinne Carlson
OK, I’ll play, here’s my fave artist billboard: Corinne Carlson
to the comment: “adds a level of self-reference”, that is a game-plan long ago debunked as anything more than ontology-writ-obvious, certainly since the conceptual days and reinforced in the 1980s. It also doesn’t matter opearting within the reams of film scripts that made it to cinema – or did I miss the Hollywood implosion. Whatever, Banksy satisfies the desperate-liberals of this era, perfect-built for the shift from Bono to Brangilina worldview.
Yes, there IS a difference to the women or feminist-artists cited in the article: position. They remain fighting an uphill battle and in regards to representation particularly, and they address that. NOT some cod-politics about exposing how advertisment-system works.
Banksy is in as comfortable position as it possible in the art world of galleries and collectors: he gets to still stick to b.s. of “street cred” to pump up his sales to those buyers who need validation to spend too much and assuage their guilt. And the press loves it because of prices and Brangilina, not because any of them are going to discuss the politics of advertising billboards.
to the comment: “adds a level of self-reference”, that is a game-plan long ago debunked as anything more than ontology-writ-obvious, certainly since the conceptual days and reinforced in the 1980s. It also doesn’t matter opearting within the reams of film scripts that made it to cinema – or did I miss the Hollywood implosion. Whatever, Banksy satisfies the desperate-liberals of this era, perfect-built for the shift from Bono to Brangilina worldview.
Yes, there IS a difference to the women or feminist-artists cited in the article: position. They remain fighting an uphill battle and in regards to representation particularly, and they address that. NOT some cod-politics about exposing how advertisment-system works.
Banksy is in as comfortable position as it possible in the art world of galleries and collectors: he gets to still stick to b.s. of “street cred” to pump up his sales to those buyers who need validation to spend too much and assuage their guilt. And the press loves it because of prices and Brangilina, not because any of them are going to discuss the politics of advertising billboards.
Okay you two: The text I used simply pointed out one similarity. You’ll observe I never said: These feminist activists are commenting on the exact same thing. I didn’t say that because it’s OBVIOUSLY NOT THE CASE. The point is, he’s not doing anything all that challenging or original.
On the subject of why the press “loves” this work, I think it’s a very narrow interpretation to label those motivations as commerce and gossip or to pin interest in an artist entirely on one profession. Obviously there’s a lot more at play than this.
Okay you two: The text I used simply pointed out one similarity. You’ll observe I never said: These feminist activists are commenting on the exact same thing. I didn’t say that because it’s OBVIOUSLY NOT THE CASE. The point is, he’s not doing anything all that challenging or original.
On the subject of why the press “loves” this work, I think it’s a very narrow interpretation to label those motivations as commerce and gossip or to pin interest in an artist entirely on one profession. Obviously there’s a lot more at play than this.
So, while the works above don’t do much for you, any thoughts on the pet store?
http://www.woostercollective.com/2008/10/the_village_pet_store_and_charchoal_gril.html
So, while the works above don’t do much for you, any thoughts on the pet store?
http://www.woostercollective.com/2008/10/the_village_pet_store_and_charchoal_gril.html
the pet store…
It’s trite and ham-handed, obvious and cartoon-y (in a bad way).
It’s a not-so-smart editorial cartoon attempting to use the forms of contemporary art. Which, BTW, is most of his work.
the pet store…
It’s trite and ham-handed, obvious and cartoon-y (in a bad way).
It’s a not-so-smart editorial cartoon attempting to use the forms of contemporary art. Which, BTW, is most of his work.
“Amazing! Subversive! And what a trail blazer! Who could have predicted artists would use billboards as a means of critical expression?”
And so what? Why the hostility? Change the context a little to see how shallow you’re being:
“Amazing! Subversive! And what a trail blazer! Who could have predicted artists would use pig’s hair tied to a stick to brush paint on canvas?”
Of course other artists have used billboards. Did Mr. B say he was first? You’ve enlisted him in an argument he’s not having.
(I love this blog. I do. Big testy ideas deep in the art realm.)Regina
“Amazing! Subversive! And what a trail blazer! Who could have predicted artists would use billboards as a means of critical expression?”
And so what? Why the hostility? Change the context a little to see how shallow you’re being:
“Amazing! Subversive! And what a trail blazer! Who could have predicted artists would use pig’s hair tied to a stick to brush paint on canvas?”
Of course other artists have used billboards. Did Mr. B say he was first? You’ve enlisted him in an argument he’s not having.
(I love this blog. I do. Big testy ideas deep in the art realm.)Regina
Regina: You’re right to point out that the artist never claimed he was the first to use billboards, so the argument isn’t one he suggested. My issue would be better expressed with the people who cover this artist as though he is doing something groundbreaking. Thanks for that.
However, I’m not sure why changing the context should illuminate how shallow I’m being. The post illustrates misdirected hostility but I’m not sure that I could characterize that as a result of shallowness.
Regina: You’re right to point out that the artist never claimed he was the first to use billboards, so the argument isn’t one he suggested. My issue would be better expressed with the people who cover this artist as though he is doing something groundbreaking. Thanks for that.
However, I’m not sure why changing the context should illuminate how shallow I’m being. The post illustrates misdirected hostility but I’m not sure that I could characterize that as a result of shallowness.
I agree that the sensationalism surrounding Banksy is more than a little overdone, especially at this point in his career. I think the shallowness comes about in criticizing him for something that he isn’t setting out to do (at least explicitly), which is to be groundbreaking or trail blazing. Instead, the attack should be directed at his self-defeating philosophical mission: If he seeks to question the ethics of letting someone write anything on a wall just because they have money, he’d be a lot more clever to do it without, you know, paying money.
I agree that the sensationalism surrounding Banksy is more than a little overdone, especially at this point in his career. I think the shallowness comes about in criticizing him for something that he isn’t setting out to do (at least explicitly), which is to be groundbreaking or trail blazing. Instead, the attack should be directed at his self-defeating philosophical mission: If he seeks to question the ethics of letting someone write anything on a wall just because they have money, he’d be a lot more clever to do it without, you know, paying money.
I suppose my pride has a stake in this, but I really am inclined to characterize that as a mistake as opposed to some kind of innate shallowness.
I suppose my pride has a stake in this, but I really am inclined to characterize that as a mistake as opposed to some kind of innate shallowness.
Ok, I take back shallow. All of people, you’re not that. Wrong word. Ding! But The idea that only a few artists can use a medium like a billboard but many hundreds of thousands can use paint on canvas without complaint stops me.
What surrounds Banksy is not his fault. Reminds me of something Allen Ginsberg said about William Carlos Williams, honoring his life, “what he tried to be among the bastards out there.” I honor a guy like B, despite the hype, which is not his hype, and I honor a site like Art Fag City, where art and ideas matter. Regina Hackett
Ok, I take back shallow. All of people, you’re not that. Wrong word. Ding! But The idea that only a few artists can use a medium like a billboard but many hundreds of thousands can use paint on canvas without complaint stops me.
What surrounds Banksy is not his fault. Reminds me of something Allen Ginsberg said about William Carlos Williams, honoring his life, “what he tried to be among the bastards out there.” I honor a guy like B, despite the hype, which is not his hype, and I honor a site like Art Fag City, where art and ideas matter. Regina Hackett
Comments on this entry are closed.