Besides, if this guy is gonna do some girls from below, find some with nice thighs and some booty. flat assed, salad tong legged white girls just dont give me that lift I enjoy.

Besides their titles and gallery context, I don’t find much difference between Kern’s photos and stock-imagery for many an “alternative” publications, the sort where images of pretty young women drooling toothpaste, pissing, and affectedly getting their anti-fashion vamp on is just business as usual. If this stuff infuriates and/or titillates, it’s low-level and ubiquitous—which leads me to guess that Kern is well aware of the generic smuttiness of his work, if not its continued marketability, and consequently is as complicit as cake. First-wave feminists have adequately dealt with these kinds of images (which are freighted & fraught), but in the end we’re just recycling banality.

This is for voyeurs with sexual performance issues. No hot blooded hetero would be turned on by this at all. Even porno sites would turn away, they got much more agressive works, and far better looking women. Models are waifs these days, belemic and boring. Hetero males are attracted to fertility, youth, vigor, sexuality. I see none. So not really porno. But a sub set of sexually impoverished boys with Napoleon complexes.

Just weird, and certainly not art. Erotic can be great, if handled in a way that strikes more than just the groin region. Sexuality is part of who we are, and a legitimate subject. But not in the hands a of a perv, with performance issues.

Boring, actually.

Art collegia delenda est