Comments on: AFC Doesn’t Ask Stuckists For Comment on Russia’s Central Museum of Armed Forces http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/ New York art news and reviews. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Erichttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-98537 Eric Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:35:36 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-98537 At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that "There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism" in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term "Stuckists". I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that "I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention." At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that “There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism” in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term “Stuckists”. I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that “I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention.”

]]> By: Erichttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314551 Eric Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:35:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314551 At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that "There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism" in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term "Stuckists". I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that "I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention." At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that “There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism” in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term “Stuckists”. I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that “I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention.”

]]> By: Erichttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314552 Eric Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:35:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314552 At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that "There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism" in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term "Stuckists". I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that "I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention." At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that “There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism” in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term “Stuckists”. I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that “I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention.”

]]> By: Erichttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314553 Eric Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:35:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314553 At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that "There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism" in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term "Stuckists". I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that "I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention." At this point I have to agree with Mr. Thomson, that “There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism” in the sense that I took the term and ran with it. I could have been talking about any number of things when I used the term “Stuckists”. I may or may not have made some cogent points along the way but like Paddy, I think that “I’d rather invest my time thinking about artists who warrant the attention.”

]]> By: Charles Thomsonhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-98520 Charles Thomson Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:51:18 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-98520 There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism, at least my proposition for it. I don't posit myself as against the establishment as such: I'm for it. I'm just against this particular art establishment, at least as it operates in the UK. Stuckism was established to promote the work of the artists in the group, so that doesn't actually need any further enquiry to establish. I just say what I think about things and express my reaction to them. Some things I find empty, so I say so. I say what I like as well. It's not restricted to Stuckists, but a lot of them do art that works for me. There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism, at least my proposition for it. I don’t posit myself as against the establishment as such: I’m for it. I’m just against this particular art establishment, at least as it operates in the UK. Stuckism was established to promote the work of the artists in the group, so that doesn’t actually need any further enquiry to establish. I just say what I think about things and express my reaction to them. Some things I find empty, so I say so. I say what I like as well. It’s not restricted to Stuckists, but a lot of them do art that works for me.

]]> By: Charles Thomsonhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314549 Charles Thomson Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:51:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314549 There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism, at least my proposition for it. I don't posit myself as against the establishment as such: I'm for it. I'm just against this particular art establishment, at least as it operates in the UK. Stuckism was established to promote the work of the artists in the group, so that doesn't actually need any further enquiry to establish. I just say what I think about things and express my reaction to them. Some things I find empty, so I say so. I say what I like as well. It's not restricted to Stuckists, but a lot of them do art that works for me. There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism, at least my proposition for it. I don’t posit myself as against the establishment as such: I’m for it. I’m just against this particular art establishment, at least as it operates in the UK. Stuckism was established to promote the work of the artists in the group, so that doesn’t actually need any further enquiry to establish. I just say what I think about things and express my reaction to them. Some things I find empty, so I say so. I say what I like as well. It’s not restricted to Stuckists, but a lot of them do art that works for me.

]]> By: Charles Thomsonhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314550 Charles Thomson Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:51:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314550 There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism, at least my proposition for it. I don't posit myself as against the establishment as such: I'm for it. I'm just against this particular art establishment, at least as it operates in the UK. Stuckism was established to promote the work of the artists in the group, so that doesn't actually need any further enquiry to establish. I just say what I think about things and express my reaction to them. Some things I find empty, so I say so. I say what I like as well. It's not restricted to Stuckists, but a lot of them do art that works for me. There seem to be some misunderstandings about Stuckism, at least my proposition for it. I don’t posit myself as against the establishment as such: I’m for it. I’m just against this particular art establishment, at least as it operates in the UK. Stuckism was established to promote the work of the artists in the group, so that doesn’t actually need any further enquiry to establish. I just say what I think about things and express my reaction to them. Some things I find empty, so I say so. I say what I like as well. It’s not restricted to Stuckists, but a lot of them do art that works for me.

]]> By: Donald Frazellhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-98435 Donald Frazell Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:28:48 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-98435 I simply dont see what all the fuss is about, looks like typical art gallery stuff to me. Yeah, its badly done, on purpose they claim, and as alot of them are as old as I am, and show no improvement or actual change in their work, they are stuckists. Stuck in the past. Sorta like communism, sounds good, better than old capitalism, but cant move, grow, mutate, evolve. But then, look at what we mutated into. 99% of mutations are bad, only 1%, or less, aid in evolution. And we are on the brink of collapse. We are again treating the symtom, and not the disease. Well, for one, I aint goin down without a fight. Not my way.Basics of revolt are fine, but revolt for and to what? Again, they have no purpose. What they spout is about 5% of what is needed to evolve a style of substance, they are lacking. So call them Lackers if you want. But again, like what they are against is so much better. The quote that Childish is one of the most interesting artists in Britain, is what we used to call, damning with faint praise. They are all suckists. At least they kinda know it, but just none of them truly has any talent. Should go into other fields, like art is really all that important anymore. Could be, should be, perhaps will be. But isnt. I simply dont see what all the fuss is about, looks like typical art gallery stuff to me. Yeah, its badly done, on purpose they claim, and as alot of them are as old as I am, and show no improvement or actual change in their work, they are stuckists. Stuck in the past. Sorta like communism, sounds good, better than old capitalism, but cant move, grow, mutate, evolve. But then, look at what we mutated into. 99% of mutations are bad, only 1%, or less, aid in evolution. And we are on the brink of collapse. We are again treating the symtom, and not the disease. Well, for one, I aint goin down without a fight. Not my way.

Basics of revolt are fine, but revolt for and to what? Again, they have no purpose. What they spout is about 5% of what is needed to evolve a style of substance, they are lacking. So call them Lackers if you want. But again, like what they are against is so much better. The quote that Childish is one of the most interesting artists in Britain, is what we used to call, damning with faint praise. They are all suckists. At least they kinda know it, but just none of them truly has any talent. Should go into other fields, like art is really all that important anymore. Could be, should be, perhaps will be. But isnt.

]]> By: Donald Frazellhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314546 Donald Frazell Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:28:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314546 I simply dont see what all the fuss is about, looks like typical art gallery stuff to me. Yeah, its badly done, on purpose they claim, and as alot of them are as old as I am, and show no improvement or actual change in their work, they are stuckists. Stuck in the past. Sorta like communism, sounds good, better than old capitalism, but cant move, grow, mutate, evolve. But then, look at what we mutated into. 99% of mutations are bad, only 1%, or less, aid in evolution. And we are on the brink of collapse. We are again treating the symtom, and not the disease. Well, for one, I aint goin down without a fight. Not my way.Basics of revolt are fine, but revolt for and to what? Again, they have no purpose. What they spout is about 5% of what is needed to evolve a style of substance, they are lacking. So call them Lackers if you want. But again, like what they are against is so much better. The quote that Childish is one of the most interesting artists in Britain, is what we used to call, damning with faint praise. They are all suckists. At least they kinda know it, but just none of them truly has any talent. Should go into other fields, like art is really all that important anymore. Could be, should be, perhaps will be. But isnt. I simply dont see what all the fuss is about, looks like typical art gallery stuff to me. Yeah, its badly done, on purpose they claim, and as alot of them are as old as I am, and show no improvement or actual change in their work, they are stuckists. Stuck in the past. Sorta like communism, sounds good, better than old capitalism, but cant move, grow, mutate, evolve. But then, look at what we mutated into. 99% of mutations are bad, only 1%, or less, aid in evolution. And we are on the brink of collapse. We are again treating the symtom, and not the disease. Well, for one, I aint goin down without a fight. Not my way.

Basics of revolt are fine, but revolt for and to what? Again, they have no purpose. What they spout is about 5% of what is needed to evolve a style of substance, they are lacking. So call them Lackers if you want. But again, like what they are against is so much better. The quote that Childish is one of the most interesting artists in Britain, is what we used to call, damning with faint praise. They are all suckists. At least they kinda know it, but just none of them truly has any talent. Should go into other fields, like art is really all that important anymore. Could be, should be, perhaps will be. But isnt.

]]> By: Donald Frazellhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/comment-page-2/#comment-314547 Donald Frazell Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:28:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/09/17/afc-doesnt-ask-stuckists-for-comment-on-russias-central-museum-of-armed-forces/#comment-314547 I simply dont see what all the fuss is about, looks like typical art gallery stuff to me. Yeah, its badly done, on purpose they claim, and as alot of them are as old as I am, and show no improvement or actual change in their work, they are stuckists. Stuck in the past. Sorta like communism, sounds good, better than old capitalism, but cant move, grow, mutate, evolve. But then, look at what we mutated into. 99% of mutations are bad, only 1%, or less, aid in evolution. And we are on the brink of collapse. We are again treating the symtom, and not the disease. Well, for one, I aint goin down without a fight. Not my way.Basics of revolt are fine, but revolt for and to what? Again, they have no purpose. What they spout is about 5% of what is needed to evolve a style of substance, they are lacking. So call them Lackers if you want. But again, like what they are against is so much better. The quote that Childish is one of the most interesting artists in Britain, is what we used to call, damning with faint praise. They are all suckists. At least they kinda know it, but just none of them truly has any talent. Should go into other fields, like art is really all that important anymore. Could be, should be, perhaps will be. But isnt. I simply dont see what all the fuss is about, looks like typical art gallery stuff to me. Yeah, its badly done, on purpose they claim, and as alot of them are as old as I am, and show no improvement or actual change in their work, they are stuckists. Stuck in the past. Sorta like communism, sounds good, better than old capitalism, but cant move, grow, mutate, evolve. But then, look at what we mutated into. 99% of mutations are bad, only 1%, or less, aid in evolution. And we are on the brink of collapse. We are again treating the symtom, and not the disease. Well, for one, I aint goin down without a fight. Not my way.

Basics of revolt are fine, but revolt for and to what? Again, they have no purpose. What they spout is about 5% of what is needed to evolve a style of substance, they are lacking. So call them Lackers if you want. But again, like what they are against is so much better. The quote that Childish is one of the most interesting artists in Britain, is what we used to call, damning with faint praise. They are all suckists. At least they kinda know it, but just none of them truly has any talent. Should go into other fields, like art is really all that important anymore. Could be, should be, perhaps will be. But isnt.

]]>