<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pace Wildenstein&#8217;s No Photo Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/</link>
	<description>As relevant as Eric Fischl. New York art news, reviews and gossip.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-74152</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/#comment-74152</guid>
		<description>It's a practical way of keeping track of their press.  I don't know how much of that has to do with this though. I suspect it just has to do with them not wanting poor representations of the work posted on flickr.  The thing is, everyone knows what they are getting when they go to that site, so I really don't see what the problem is.  If I were them, I'd invest my resources in improving their shitty website. A wealth of professionally taken images available online would obviously solve any issues they had with the random ones people are taking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a practical way of keeping track of their press.  I don&#8217;t know how much of that has to do with this though. I suspect it just has to do with them not wanting poor representations of the work posted on flickr.  The thing is, everyone knows what they are getting when they go to that site, so I really don&#8217;t see what the problem is.  If I were them, I&#8217;d invest my resources in improving their shitty website. A wealth of professionally taken images available online would obviously solve any issues they had with the random ones people are taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Sherwin myartspace</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-74010</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sherwin myartspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/#comment-74010</guid>
		<description>Very odd. Could it be that they want to have control over who covers their exhibits as far as the press is concerned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very odd. Could it be that they want to have control over who covers their exhibits as far as the press is concerned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Mattera Art Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-72748</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Mattera Art Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/#comment-72748</guid>
		<description>I had no problem when I shot the Bridget Riley show in January, but when I went to shoot the recent Nozkowski installation, the no-photos policy was in effect. I ended up pulling images from their site (which were very good), but I have also made the decision to not write about subsequent shows.

Really, if they're concerned about their artists' copyright issues, they shouldn't post images on their own site, which are legally usable for reportage. And, they'd have to dismantle Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no problem when I shot the Bridget Riley show in January, but when I went to shoot the recent Nozkowski installation, the no-photos policy was in effect. I ended up pulling images from their site (which were very good), but I have also made the decision to not write about subsequent shows.</p>
<p>Really, if they&#8217;re concerned about their artists&#8217; copyright issues, they shouldn&#8217;t post images on their own site, which are legally usable for reportage. And, they&#8217;d have to dismantle Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-72607</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/#comment-72607</guid>
		<description>It's a gallery policy, and not specific to one show. I discussed the gallery's no photo policy with their PR person last month.  According to their publicist there were specific instances that led them to the decision that it be necessary to restrict the general public from taking pictures. Lord knows what they were.  The exchange was entirely pleasant, but I just don't agree with their policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a gallery policy, and not specific to one show. I discussed the gallery&#8217;s no photo policy with their PR person last month.  According to their publicist there were specific instances that led them to the decision that it be necessary to restrict the general public from taking pictures. Lord knows what they were.  The exchange was entirely pleasant, but I just don&#8217;t agree with their policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-72538</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/#comment-72538</guid>
		<description>i wonder why they decided do make (or enforce) this... i remember taking many photos of roslyn drexler and tara donovan, with no problems. maybe it's just for this show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder why they decided do make (or enforce) this&#8230; i remember taking many photos of roslyn drexler and tara donovan, with no problems. maybe it&#8217;s just for this show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protogenes</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-72436</link>
		<dc:creator>protogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/07/01/pace-wildensteins-no-photo-policy/#comment-72436</guid>
		<description>You're lucky they let you photograph the sign</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re lucky they let you photograph the sign</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
