<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Guys We Would Fuck: An Interview with Nayland Blake</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nayland Blake performs &#8220;Gorge&#8221; &#171; updownacross</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-126158</link> <dc:creator>Nayland Blake performs &#8220;Gorge&#8221; &#171; updownacross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:27:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-126158</guid> <description>[...] with art fag city. A few quotes [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with art fag city. A few quotes [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Hill</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-71699</link> <dc:creator>The Hill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:05:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-71699</guid> <description>I tend to agree w/ the canine. &quot;ask participants to chose(sic) the men they’d fuck&quot; This does privilege male gaze/desire, albeit homoerotic, as opposed to premising the DesireFest as the women or persons they&#039;d fuck. I think the issue breaks on whether or not we consider asking a lesbian (a dying term I hate to tell u) to desire a hetero male orientation is an insult or a discounting. Maybe if we went to a dyke bar and asked an old fashioned butch top or femme down we might get our answer. On the other hand identity is slippery as do we call the hetero male who has a once in a life time sexual encounter w/ a male Gay? But then this daycare is run by an Art Fag, so be it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree w/ the canine. &#8220;ask participants to chose(sic) the men they’d fuck&#8221; This does privilege male gaze/desire, albeit homoerotic, as opposed to premising the DesireFest as the women or persons they&#8217;d fuck. I think the issue breaks on whether or not we consider asking a lesbian (a dying term I hate to tell u) to desire a hetero male orientation is an insult or a discounting. Maybe if we went to a dyke bar and asked an old fashioned butch top or femme down we might get our answer. On the other hand identity is slippery as do we call the hetero male who has a once in a life time sexual encounter w/ a male Gay? But then this daycare is run by an Art Fag, so be it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Hill</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-314158</link> <dc:creator>The Hill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-314158</guid> <description>I tend to agree w/ the canine. &quot;ask participants to chose(sic) the men they’d fuck&quot; This does privilege male gaze/desire, albeit homoerotic, as opposed to premising the DesireFest as the women or persons they&#039;d fuck. I think the issue breaks on whether or not we consider asking a lesbian (a dying term I hate to tell u) to desire a hetero male orientation is an insult or a discounting. Maybe if we went to a dyke bar and asked an old fashioned butch top or femme down we might get our answer. On the other hand identity is slippery as do we call the hetero male who has a once in a life time sexual encounter w/ a male Gay? But then this daycare is run by an Art Fag, so be it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree w/ the canine. &#8220;ask participants to chose(sic) the men they’d fuck&#8221; This does privilege male gaze/desire, albeit homoerotic, as opposed to premising the DesireFest as the women or persons they&#8217;d fuck. I think the issue breaks on whether or not we consider asking a lesbian (a dying term I hate to tell u) to desire a hetero male orientation is an insult or a discounting. Maybe if we went to a dyke bar and asked an old fashioned butch top or femme down we might get our answer. On the other hand identity is slippery as do we call the hetero male who has a once in a life time sexual encounter w/ a male Gay? But then this daycare is run by an Art Fag, so be it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-71201</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:30:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-71201</guid> <description>You&#039;re the first person to have mentioned Foucault around here arf arf. This show is about having a bit of fun, it isn&#039;t a deep investment in theory.I don&#039;t see what the problem is with biasing a show towards homosexual fantasy.  Your comments sound homophobic to me, and will not be approved if you continue to troll the blog in this manner.  Also, I will remind you that the show isn&#039;t biased towards homosexual fantasy but bisexual fantasy, since the women Blake asked to select a man they would fuck are lesbians and straight men.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the first person to have mentioned Foucault around here arf arf. This show is about having a bit of fun, it isn&#8217;t a deep investment in theory.</p><p>I don&#8217;t see what the problem is with biasing a show towards homosexual fantasy.  Your comments sound homophobic to me, and will not be approved if you continue to troll the blog in this manner.  Also, I will remind you that the show isn&#8217;t biased towards homosexual fantasy but bisexual fantasy, since the women Blake asked to select a man they would fuck are lesbians and straight men.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-314157</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-314157</guid> <description>You&#039;re the first person to have mentioned Foucault around here arf arf. This show is about having a bit of fun, it isn&#039;t a deep investment in theory.I don&#039;t see what the problem is with biasing a show towards homosexual fantasy.  Your comments sound homophobic to me, and will not be approved if you continue to troll the blog in this manner.  Also, I will remind you that the show isn&#039;t biased towards homosexual fantasy but bisexual fantasy, since the women Blake asked to select a man they would fuck are lesbians and straight men.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the first person to have mentioned Foucault around here arf arf. This show is about having a bit of fun, it isn&#8217;t a deep investment in theory.</p><p>I don&#8217;t see what the problem is with biasing a show towards homosexual fantasy.  Your comments sound homophobic to me, and will not be approved if you continue to troll the blog in this manner.  Also, I will remind you that the show isn&#8217;t biased towards homosexual fantasy but bisexual fantasy, since the women Blake asked to select a man they would fuck are lesbians and straight men.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arf arf</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-71196</link> <dc:creator>arf arf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:09:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-71196</guid> <description>I also forgot to add since I&#039;m not interested in fucking men, I find the queering biased in favor of homosexual fantasy. Haven&#039;t we gotten past Foucault&#039;s bodies and pleasures yet? This gives FUCKING a bad name.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also forgot to add since I&#8217;m not interested in fucking men, I find the queering biased in favor of homosexual fantasy. Haven&#8217;t we gotten past Foucault&#8217;s bodies and pleasures yet? This gives FUCKING a bad name.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arf arf</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-314156</link> <dc:creator>arf arf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-314156</guid> <description>I also forgot to add since I&#039;m not interested in fucking men, I find the queering biased in favor of homosexual fantasy. Haven&#039;t we gotten past Foucault&#039;s bodies and pleasures yet? This gives FUCKING a bad name.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also forgot to add since I&#8217;m not interested in fucking men, I find the queering biased in favor of homosexual fantasy. Haven&#8217;t we gotten past Foucault&#8217;s bodies and pleasures yet? This gives FUCKING a bad name.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-71190</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:47:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-71190</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t know about Steve Reinke - that piece sounds pretty good.  It reminds of this study a friend told me about, in which they asked participants to identify the &quot;professional&quot; in a side by side comparison of two pictures.  Be it an accountant, a lawyer, whatever, something like 95% of the time the most attractive person was chosen.  In any event, after that I really paid more attention to what I wore to interviews. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about Steve Reinke &#8211; that piece sounds pretty good.  It reminds of this study a friend told me about, in which they asked participants to identify the &#8220;professional&#8221; in a side by side comparison of two pictures.  Be it an accountant, a lawyer, whatever, something like 95% of the time the most attractive person was chosen.  In any event, after that I really paid more attention to what I wore to interviews.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-314155</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-314155</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t know about Steve Reinke - that piece sounds pretty good.  It reminds of this study a friend told me about, in which they asked participants to identify the &quot;professional&quot; in a side by side comparison of two pictures.  Be it an accountant, a lawyer, whatever, something like 95% of the time the most attractive person was chosen.  In any event, after that I really paid more attention to what I wore to interviews.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about Steve Reinke &#8211; that piece sounds pretty good.  It reminds of this study a friend told me about, in which they asked participants to identify the &#8220;professional&#8221; in a side by side comparison of two pictures.  Be it an accountant, a lawyer, whatever, something like 95% of the time the most attractive person was chosen.  In any event, after that I really paid more attention to what I wore to interviews.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arf arf</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/comment-page-1/#comment-71064</link> <dc:creator>arf arf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:27:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/06/24/the-guys-we-would-fuck-an-interview-with-nayland-blake/#comment-71064</guid> <description>Could u find work more dull? I wish u could use a rating system to let readers know. As usual the rhetoric is queer theory university certified and the visuals deletable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could u find work more dull? I wish u could use a rating system to let readers know. As usual the rhetoric is queer theory university certified and the visuals deletable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 10:18:16 -->
