<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massive Links! Fairly Massive Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/</link>
	<description>As relevant as Eric Fischl. New York art news, reviews and gossip.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breeze</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-62772</link>
		<dc:creator>Breeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/#comment-62772</guid>
		<description>I have a few problems with www.artreview.com and their networking site for artists. I don't want to rant so I will focus on what I consider the main issue. They harvest emails and SPAM! I've been contacted on each of my email accounts. Each one asks me to upload my work on their site. The person never responds when I reply. Great. The only problem is that two of those emails are only located on another art site that I'm on. This means that they are harvesting emails from other art sites. That won't win them any friends and it is the type of issue that Wired loves. I expected more from ArtReview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a few problems with <a href="http://www.artreview.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.artreview.com</a> and their networking site for artists. I don&#8217;t want to rant so I will focus on what I consider the main issue. They harvest emails and SPAM! I&#8217;ve been contacted on each of my email accounts. Each one asks me to upload my work on their site. The person never responds when I reply. Great. The only problem is that two of those emails are only located on another art site that I&#8217;m on. This means that they are harvesting emails from other art sites. That won&#8217;t win them any friends and it is the type of issue that Wired loves. I expected more from ArtReview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-MONSTER.net. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Digest. 05.12.08.</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-59468</link>
		<dc:creator>C-MONSTER.net. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Digest. 05.12.08.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/#comment-59468</guid>
		<description>[...] In related news: gratuitous shots of Gallery 303-related stuff on Look, See and Heart as Arena. Plus: understanding Fair Use, courtesy of AFC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In related news: gratuitous shots of Gallery 303-related stuff on Look, See and Heart as Arena. Plus: understanding Fair Use, courtesy of AFC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.M.</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-59056</link>
		<dc:creator>L.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/05/09/massive-links-fairly-massive-edition/#comment-59056</guid>
		<description>re: bloggers and their images.  

What is that gallery claiming?  Copyright remains with the artist they are representing and, as an artist, my only issue with the photos in question is the quality. I'd be sending better images to the blogger, not a misinformed legal sounding letter. (though it sounds like the gallery was working on its own behalf)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: bloggers and their images.  </p>
<p>What is that gallery claiming?  Copyright remains with the artist they are representing and, as an artist, my only issue with the photos in question is the quality. I&#8217;d be sending better images to the blogger, not a misinformed legal sounding letter. (though it sounds like the gallery was working on its own behalf)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
