The Eyebeam reBlog has had an environment and sustainability focus for three months now. That has been part of an ongoing series of programming at Eyebeam under the umbrella “Beyond Light Bulbs” resulting from a Sustainability research group we have that has been meeting for almost 2 years now. We’re pretty excited about it still. The Feedback exhibition, opening this Thursday March 13, 6 – 8pm, is the culmination of this programming series. Come along and check out the results at Eyebeam’s physical space. http://www.eyebeam.org/engage/engage.php?page=exhibitions&id=157

We are always happy to hear from people who are keen to be reBloggers. I am unaware that yours and Paddy’s feeds have been removed. But happy to look into that for you.

cheers

Amanda

The Eyebeam reBlog has had an environment and sustainability focus for three months now. That has been part of an ongoing series of programming at Eyebeam under the umbrella “Beyond Light Bulbs” resulting from a Sustainability research group we have that has been meeting for almost 2 years now. We’re pretty excited about it still. The Feedback exhibition, opening this Thursday March 13, 6 – 8pm, is the culmination of this programming series. Come along and check out the results at Eyebeam’s physical space. http://www.eyebeam.org/engage/engage.php?page=exhibitions&id=157

We are always happy to hear from people who are keen to be reBloggers. I am unaware that yours and Paddy’s feeds have been removed. But happy to look into that for you.

cheers

Amanda

Paddy, you and I were both reBloggers and unless I’m missing something both of our feeds have been dropped from the reBlog list.

The lack of loyalty is disheartening. I worked hard for them!

As for the Whitney, good call by Ed Winkelman that the “failure” theme had been in the works for a couple of years before the current stock market downturn, so there goes Holland Cotter’s thesis.

As for the failure/slacker theme it’s weird that seems to be the curatorial zeitgeist, as reflected in this show and “Unmonumental.” (Truly, this is Rachel Harrison’s moment; the art world has nothing left it can give her.) If anything it’s curators trying to balance a go-go market with some hair shirt abjection rather than evidence of an art world slide.

As for “no internet,” the lines have been drawn. The Whitney curators are holding the line for powerful, venerable, extremely old collectors who can accept slacker art but get all flummoxed by a mouse and keyboard.

Paddy, you and I were both reBloggers and unless I’m missing something both of our feeds have been dropped from the reBlog list.

The lack of loyalty is disheartening. I worked hard for them!

As for the Whitney, good call by Ed Winkelman that the “failure” theme had been in the works for a couple of years before the current stock market downturn, so there goes Holland Cotter’s thesis.

As for the failure/slacker theme it’s weird that seems to be the curatorial zeitgeist, as reflected in this show and “Unmonumental.” (Truly, this is Rachel Harrison’s moment; the art world has nothing left it can give her.) If anything it’s curators trying to balance a go-go market with some hair shirt abjection rather than evidence of an art world slide.

As for “no internet,” the lines have been drawn. The Whitney curators are holding the line for powerful, venerable, extremely old collectors who can accept slacker art but get all flummoxed by a mouse and keyboard.

Right now the reblog is focusing on environmental sustainability issues… while I find that somewhat interesting, it’s not going to draw me back daily (or even weekly).

Perhaps the reblog would work better if its content was 50% art&technology and 50% guest blogger’s interests.

Right now the reblog is focusing on environmental sustainability issues… while I find that somewhat interesting, it’s not going to draw me back daily (or even weekly).

Perhaps the reblog would work better if its content was 50% art&technology and 50% guest blogger’s interests.