Comments on: Overheard at the New Museum http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/ New York art news and reviews. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: triphttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-28159 trip Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:21:42 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-28159 I take exception to the notion that "sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos." Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.c. I take exception to the notion that “sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.” Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.

c.

]]> By: triphttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312388 trip Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:21:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312388 I take exception to the notion that "sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos." Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.c. I take exception to the notion that “sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.” Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.

c.

]]> By: triphttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312389 trip Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:21:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312389 I take exception to the notion that "sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos." Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.c. I take exception to the notion that “sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.” Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.

c.

]]> By: triphttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312390 trip Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:21:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312390 I take exception to the notion that "sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos." Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.c. I take exception to the notion that “sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.” Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.

c.

]]> By: triphttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312391 trip Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:21:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312391 I take exception to the notion that "sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos." Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.c. I take exception to the notion that “sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.” Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.

c.

]]> By: triphttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312392 trip Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:21:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312392 I take exception to the notion that "sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos." Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.c. I take exception to the notion that “sensors make a more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.” Under that optic, all non-interactive art is uninteresting (is seeing a painting or a sculpture more interesting with sensors?). As I said before, not all digital art must be (or should be) interactive. Interactivity is simply a strategy in art making (note that interactivity need not be digital), and it should be used only when it is conceptually appropriate.

c.

]]> By: Sarahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-27412 Sara Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:25:22 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-27412 In response to 'c': Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos. In response to ‘c’: Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.

]]> By: Sarahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312384 Sara Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:25:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312384 In response to 'c': Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos. In response to ‘c’: Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.

]]> By: Sarahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312385 Sara Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:25:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312385 In response to 'c': Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos. In response to ‘c’: Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.

]]> By: Sarahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-312386 Sara Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:25:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/02/15/overheard-at-the-new-museum/#comment-312386 In response to 'c': Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos. In response to ‘c’: Net art refers to artwork designed for the Internet. Sensors do not make internet or net or netscape art but were a way of expressing the interactivity of the web. A more interesting experience than standing with headphones watching utube videos.

]]>