Comments on: The Worst of the Web! http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/ New York art news and reviews. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: flash texthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-326805 flash text Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:04:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-326805 Thank you for sharing this information. I found it very needful for me. Thanks Thank you for sharing this information. I found it very needful for me. Thanks

]]> By: flash texthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-326806 flash text Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:04:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-326806 Thank you for sharing this information. I found it very needful for me. Thanks Thank you for sharing this information. I found it very needful for me. Thanks

]]> By: Jody Schmidthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-143498 Jody Schmidt Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:42 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-143498 Gawker artists embarrassingly bad? Hmmm...you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact. Gawker artists embarrassingly bad?
Hmmm…you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.

No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact.

]]> By: Jody Schmidthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-312639 Jody Schmidt Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-312639 Gawker artists embarrassingly bad? Hmmm...you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact. Gawker artists embarrassingly bad?
Hmmm…you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.

No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact.

]]> By: Jody Schmidthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-312640 Jody Schmidt Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-312640 Gawker artists embarrassingly bad? Hmmm...you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact. Gawker artists embarrassingly bad?
Hmmm…you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.

No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact.

]]> By: Jody Schmidthttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-312641 Jody Schmidt Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-312641 Gawker artists embarrassingly bad? Hmmm...you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact. Gawker artists embarrassingly bad?
Hmmm…you have almost guaranteed that one or more Gawker artists will go on to become the next VanGogh.

No matter what you say, it always works out that way. No matter how much someone thinks he knows, the quality or greatness of artwork cannot be determined myopically. It is an indisputable fact.

]]> By: Sheahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-71553 Shea Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:05:14 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-71553 Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more "Vote for me on ShowDown" bulletins I'm going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry! Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more “Vote for me on ShowDown” bulletins I’m going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry!

]]> By: Sheahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-312636 Shea Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:05:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-312636 Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more "Vote for me on ShowDown" bulletins I'm going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry! Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more “Vote for me on ShowDown” bulletins I’m going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry!

]]> By: Sheahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-312637 Shea Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:05:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-312637 Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more "Vote for me on ShowDown" bulletins I'm going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry! Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more “Vote for me on ShowDown” bulletins I’m going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry!

]]> By: Sheahttp://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-312638 Shea Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:05:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/01/09/the-worst-of-the-web/#comment-312638 Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more "Vote for me on ShowDown" bulletins I'm going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry! Saatchi online does not deserve the exposure it has had. Everyone knows that it would be one of the hundreds of shoddy art sites if it did not have his name attached to it. Since it does thousands of artists are duped daily into begging for Saatchi ShowDown votes. Which is probably why their traffic is so good! If I see one more “Vote for me on ShowDown” bulletins I’m going to scream! The sad thing is that there are some great art sites that will never get the exposure that site has. You should explore that as a blog entry!

]]>