<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Scope Needs Better Exhibitors</title> <atom:link href="http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/</link> <description>New York art news and reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-25834</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:22:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-25834</guid> <description>Ana: Nobody is censoring anyone. If Scope wants to show bad work, it&#039;s up to them.  The fact that it&#039;s bad work however isn&#039;t a debatable topic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ana: Nobody is censoring anyone. If Scope wants to show bad work, it&#8217;s up to them.  The fact that it&#8217;s bad work however isn&#8217;t a debatable topic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-312538</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-312538</guid> <description>Ana: Nobody is censoring anyone. If Scope wants to show bad work, it&#039;s up to them.  The fact that it&#039;s bad work however isn&#039;t a debatable topic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ana: Nobody is censoring anyone. If Scope wants to show bad work, it&#8217;s up to them.  The fact that it&#8217;s bad work however isn&#8217;t a debatable topic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Fag City</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-312539</link> <dc:creator>Art Fag City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-312539</guid> <description>Ana: Nobody is censoring anyone. If Scope wants to show bad work, it&#039;s up to them.  The fact that it&#039;s bad work however isn&#039;t a debatable topic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ana: Nobody is censoring anyone. If Scope wants to show bad work, it&#8217;s up to them.  The fact that it&#8217;s bad work however isn&#8217;t a debatable topic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ana Glyph</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-25829</link> <dc:creator>Ana Glyph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:46:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-25829</guid> <description>This is just censorship of art and wrong.  The artists who you criticize are very innovative.  Robert Munn and Sara Cook showcased depth as an abstract effect in the lenticular medium.  Who else in the world has showcased that to this date? You totally missed the boat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just censorship of art and wrong.  The artists who you criticize are very innovative.  Robert Munn and Sara Cook showcased depth as an abstract effect in the lenticular medium.  Who else in the world has showcased that to this date? You totally missed the boat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ana Glyph</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-312536</link> <dc:creator>Ana Glyph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-312536</guid> <description>This is just censorship of art and wrong.  The artists who you criticize are very innovative.  Robert Munn and Sara Cook showcased depth as an abstract effect in the lenticular medium.  Who else in the world has showcased that to this date? You totally missed the boat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just censorship of art and wrong.  The artists who you criticize are very innovative.  Robert Munn and Sara Cook showcased depth as an abstract effect in the lenticular medium.  Who else in the world has showcased that to this date? You totally missed the boat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ana Glyph</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-312537</link> <dc:creator>Ana Glyph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-312537</guid> <description>This is just censorship of art and wrong.  The artists who you criticize are very innovative.  Robert Munn and Sara Cook showcased depth as an abstract effect in the lenticular medium.  Who else in the world has showcased that to this date? You totally missed the boat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just censorship of art and wrong.  The artists who you criticize are very innovative.  Robert Munn and Sara Cook showcased depth as an abstract effect in the lenticular medium.  Who else in the world has showcased that to this date? You totally missed the boat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noel</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-19330</link> <dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:06:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-19330</guid> <description>Unfortunately the non-blue chip art fairs are suffering from Ralph Nader complex.  And right now there&#039;s too many Ralph Naders.  They are all taking away from each other, and none from the big dog.  If they could collaborate and combine their best exhibitors, they&#039;d have a shot.  There should be 3 levels of exhibiting during any of the major art fairs.  The Million dollar mark, the mid career, and the emerging artists.  Right now, you either shop at Basel, or you shop at any of the 4 satellites.  It&#039;d be nice if people could hit them all.Solution? Get the small art fairs to collaborate on promoting the shit out of one massive alternative fair with more glitz and glamor then Basel.  Make it a legitimate stand alone fair rather then the bastard stepchild.  No offense to any bastard step children.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the non-blue chip art fairs are suffering from Ralph Nader complex.  And right now there&#8217;s too many Ralph Naders.  They are all taking away from each other, and none from the big dog.  If they could collaborate and combine their best exhibitors, they&#8217;d have a shot.  There should be 3 levels of exhibiting during any of the major art fairs.  The Million dollar mark, the mid career, and the emerging artists.  Right now, you either shop at Basel, or you shop at any of the 4 satellites.  It&#8217;d be nice if people could hit them all.</p><p>Solution? Get the small art fairs to collaborate on promoting the shit out of one massive alternative fair with more glitz and glamor then Basel.  Make it a legitimate stand alone fair rather then the bastard stepchild.  No offense to any bastard step children.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noel</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-312535</link> <dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-312535</guid> <description>Unfortunately the non-blue chip art fairs are suffering from Ralph Nader complex.  And right now there&#039;s too many Ralph Naders.  They are all taking away from each other, and none from the big dog.  If they could collaborate and combine their best exhibitors, they&#039;d have a shot.  There should be 3 levels of exhibiting during any of the major art fairs.  The Million dollar mark, the mid career, and the emerging artists.  Right now, you either shop at Basel, or you shop at any of the 4 satellites.  It&#039;d be nice if people could hit them all.Solution? Get the small art fairs to collaborate on promoting the shit out of one massive alternative fair with more glitz and glamor then Basel.  Make it a legitimate stand alone fair rather then the bastard stepchild.  No offense to any bastard step children.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the non-blue chip art fairs are suffering from Ralph Nader complex.  And right now there&#8217;s too many Ralph Naders.  They are all taking away from each other, and none from the big dog.  If they could collaborate and combine their best exhibitors, they&#8217;d have a shot.  There should be 3 levels of exhibiting during any of the major art fairs.  The Million dollar mark, the mid career, and the emerging artists.  Right now, you either shop at Basel, or you shop at any of the 4 satellites.  It&#8217;d be nice if people could hit them all.</p><p>Solution? Get the small art fairs to collaborate on promoting the shit out of one massive alternative fair with more glitz and glamor then Basel.  Make it a legitimate stand alone fair rather then the bastard stepchild.  No offense to any bastard step children.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alexis hubshman</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-19195</link> <dc:creator>alexis hubshman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-19195</guid> <description>I hope you all will keep up the feed back so we can realize our potential.Thank you again AFC for always being a straight shooter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you all will keep up the feed back so we can realize our potential.</p><p>Thank you again AFC for always being a straight shooter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alexis hubshman</title><link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/comment-page-1/#comment-312534</link> <dc:creator>alexis hubshman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/12/11/scope-needs-better-exhibitors/#comment-312534</guid> <description>I hope you all will keep up the feed back so we can realize our potential.Thank you again AFC for always being a straight shooter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you all will keep up the feed back so we can realize our potential.</p><p>Thank you again AFC for always being a straight shooter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.artfagcity.com @ 2012-02-13 05:26:16 -->
