Comments on: Banksy Shows In New York http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/ New York art news and reviews. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Art Fag Cityhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-26882 Art Fag City Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:29:07 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-26882 What's your point Bob? This post didn't mean to address the issues you bring up, only those relating to Banksy and Hirst. If you think those artists are contributing something valuable to the field spell it out. What’s your point Bob? This post didn’t mean to address the issues you bring up, only those relating to Banksy and Hirst. If you think those artists are contributing something valuable to the field spell it out.

]]> By: Art Fag Cityhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-312100 Art Fag City Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:29:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-312100 What's your point Bob? This post didn't mean to address the issues you bring up, only those relating to Banksy and Hirst. If you think those artists are contributing something valuable to the field spell it out. What’s your point Bob? This post didn’t mean to address the issues you bring up, only those relating to Banksy and Hirst. If you think those artists are contributing something valuable to the field spell it out.

]]> By: Art Fag Cityhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-312101 Art Fag City Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:29:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-312101 What's your point Bob? This post didn't mean to address the issues you bring up, only those relating to Banksy and Hirst. If you think those artists are contributing something valuable to the field spell it out. What’s your point Bob? This post didn’t mean to address the issues you bring up, only those relating to Banksy and Hirst. If you think those artists are contributing something valuable to the field spell it out.

]]> By: bob loghttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-26881 bob log Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:25:56 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-26881 You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years. You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years.

]]> By: bob loghttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-312097 bob log Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:25:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-312097 You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years. You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years.

]]> By: bob loghttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-312098 bob log Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:25:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-312098 You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years. You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years.

]]> By: bob loghttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-312099 bob log Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:25:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-312099 You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years. You can crap all over Banksy and Hirst. Meanwhile the at world toils endlessly about the deep conceptual and psychological ramifications of the thousands of contemporary paintings that regurgitate the same old circles and squares and figures and faux naive style etc. on a canvas with a slightly updated palette and attitude but that has been done over and over for hundreds of years.

]]> By: rodrigohttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-17467 rodrigo Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:56:28 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-17467 in all fairness, banksy has nothing to do with this exhibition.this show is just a bunch of private collectors pooling together and reselling for a profit. If I understand it correctly its all old work. To blast the guy just because some greedy re-sellers write exceptionally lame press releases that name drop movie stars is a bit odd.I love your blog but if you are going critique someone at least discuss the actual work (as opposed to some third party's press release that has nothing to do with the actual artist).Last but not least: I'd pick Koons' diamond as more loathsome than anything by Hirst or Banksy. in all fairness, banksy has nothing to do with this exhibition.

this show is just a bunch of private collectors pooling together and reselling for a profit. If I understand it correctly its all old work. To blast the guy just because some greedy re-sellers write exceptionally lame press releases that name drop movie stars is a bit odd.

I love your blog but if you are going critique someone at least discuss the actual work (as opposed to some third party’s press release that has nothing to do with the actual artist).

Last but not least: I’d pick Koons’ diamond as more loathsome than anything by Hirst or Banksy.

]]> By: rodrigohttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/comment-page-1/#comment-312096 rodrigo Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:56:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/27/banksy/#comment-312096 in all fairness, banksy has nothing to do with this exhibition.this show is just a bunch of private collectors pooling together and reselling for a profit. If I understand it correctly its all old work. To blast the guy just because some greedy re-sellers write exceptionally lame press releases that name drop movie stars is a bit odd.I love your blog but if you are going critique someone at least discuss the actual work (as opposed to some third party's press release that has nothing to do with the actual artist).Last but not least: I'd pick Koons' diamond as more loathsome than anything by Hirst or Banksy. in all fairness, banksy has nothing to do with this exhibition.

this show is just a bunch of private collectors pooling together and reselling for a profit. If I understand it correctly its all old work. To blast the guy just because some greedy re-sellers write exceptionally lame press releases that name drop movie stars is a bit odd.

I love your blog but if you are going critique someone at least discuss the actual work (as opposed to some third party’s press release that has nothing to do with the actual artist).

Last but not least: I’d pick Koons’ diamond as more loathsome than anything by Hirst or Banksy.

]]>