Comments on: Art Blogs: Part Two of Two http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/ New York art news and reviews. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: m.riverhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-13115 m.river Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:06:14 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-13115 http://www.mtaa.net/mtaaRR/news/twhid/art_blog_questionaire.htmlYes, Thanks PJ but I’ll pass as well. What I do at MTAA_RR and on Tinjail makes little sense with this type of questions. The one thing I would say is that art/ review / crit blogs might want to avoid setting up standards and norms. Art needs a wide array of voices and styles. VVORKs, AFGs, MANs, ARTCALs, Reblogs, NNs, Rhizome Raws, Artnets and even Art Forum Diaries all have a role to play. http://www.mtaa.net/mtaaRR/news/twhid/art_blog_questionaire.html

Yes, Thanks PJ but I’ll pass as well. What I do at MTAA_RR and on Tinjail makes little sense with this type of questions. The one thing I would say is that art/ review / crit blogs might want to avoid setting up standards and norms. Art needs a wide array of voices and styles. VVORKs, AFGs, MANs, ARTCALs, Reblogs, NNs, Rhizome Raws, Artnets and even Art Forum Diaries all have a role to play.

]]> By: m.riverhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-313146 m.river Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:06:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-313146 http://www.mtaa.net/mtaaRR/news/twhid/art_blog_questionaire.htmlYes, Thanks PJ but I’ll pass as well. What I do at MTAA_RR and on Tinjail makes little sense with this type of questions. The one thing I would say is that art/ review / crit blogs might want to avoid setting up standards and norms. Art needs a wide array of voices and styles. VVORKs, AFGs, MANs, ARTCALs, Reblogs, NNs, Rhizome Raws, Artnets and even Art Forum Diaries all have a role to play. http://www.mtaa.net/mtaaRR/news/twhid/art_blog_questionaire.html

Yes, Thanks PJ but I’ll pass as well. What I do at MTAA_RR and on Tinjail makes little sense with this type of questions. The one thing I would say is that art/ review / crit blogs might want to avoid setting up standards and norms. Art needs a wide array of voices and styles. VVORKs, AFGs, MANs, ARTCALs, Reblogs, NNs, Rhizome Raws, Artnets and even Art Forum Diaries all have a role to play.

]]> By: martinhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-13049 martin Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:31:45 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-13049 hi paddy, thanks. i'm gonna do it... hi paddy, thanks. i’m gonna do it…

]]> By: martinhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-313145 martin Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:31:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-313145 hi paddy, thanks. i'm gonna do it... hi paddy, thanks. i’m gonna do it…

]]> By: Art Fag Cityhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-13042 Art Fag City Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:06:30 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-13042 Oh I know - they aren't very interesting at all. In the spirit of the meme however, I thought if you did do it, you would manipulate the questions so they might be more meaningful to you. Oh I know – they aren’t very interesting at all. In the spirit of the meme however, I thought if you did do it, you would manipulate the questions so they might be more meaningful to you.

]]> By: Art Fag Cityhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-313144 Art Fag City Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:06:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-313144 Oh I know - they aren't very interesting at all. In the spirit of the meme however, I thought if you did do it, you would manipulate the questions so they might be more meaningful to you. Oh I know – they aren’t very interesting at all. In the spirit of the meme however, I thought if you did do it, you would manipulate the questions so they might be more meaningful to you.

]]> By: t.whidhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-13016 t.whid Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:29:09 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-13016 Hey Paddy,Thx for the shout-out but I have to admit that I'm not really interested in answering these questions (generally, I don't find them interesting and they don't seem to apply much to the artist/blogger but more to the critic/blogger).Perhaps M.River will take a crack at it :) Hey Paddy,

Thx for the shout-out but I have to admit that I’m not really interested in answering these questions (generally, I don’t find them interesting and they don’t seem to apply much to the artist/blogger but more to the critic/blogger).

Perhaps M.River will take a crack at it :)

]]> By: t.whidhttp://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/comment-page-1/#comment-313143 t.whid Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:29:00 +0000 http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/11/02/art-blogs-part-two-of-two/#comment-313143 Hey Paddy,Thx for the shout-out but I have to admit that I'm not really interested in answering these questions (generally, I don't find them interesting and they don't seem to apply much to the artist/blogger but more to the critic/blogger).Perhaps M.River will take a crack at it :) Hey Paddy,

Thx for the shout-out but I have to admit that I’m not really interested in answering these questions (generally, I don’t find them interesting and they don’t seem to apply much to the artist/blogger but more to the critic/blogger).

Perhaps M.River will take a crack at it :)

]]>