<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BLOG For Sale</title>
	<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/</link>
	<description>As relevant as Eric Fischl. New York art news, reviews and gossip.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: b.</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1553</link>
		<author>b.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1553</guid>
					<description>to elimate the padding around the pool images, you need to just change one line in your style sheet (artfagcity.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/themes/artfagcity/style.css). 

roll down to about line 85, to a section that reads:

img /* The default image class.  A normally inserted image will have 2px padding and be centered*/

{

        padding:2px;

        text-align: center;

}



and then change "padding:2px;" to "padding:0px;"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to elimate the padding around the pool images, you need to just change one line in your style sheet (artfagcity.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/themes/artfagcity/style.css). </p>
<p>roll down to about line 85, to a section that reads:</p>
<p>img /* The default image class.  A normally inserted image will have 2px padding and be centered*/</p>
<p>{</p>
<p>        padding:2px;</p>
<p>        text-align: center;</p>
<p>}</p>
<p>and then change &#8220;padding:2px;&#8221; to &#8220;padding:0px;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1554</link>
		<author>Art Fag City</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1554</guid>
					<description>Thanks b.!  

To anyone who missed the part of the post I just removed, Tom Moody's gif wasn't displaying properly, so the above comment is a response to my solicitation for advice on how to fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks b.!  </p>
<p>To anyone who missed the part of the post I just removed, Tom Moody&#8217;s gif wasn&#8217;t displaying properly, so the above comment is a response to my solicitation for advice on how to fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b.</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1556</link>
		<author>b.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1556</guid>
					<description>I was hasty in that response; a better solution might be to restore the css file to what it was, and then simply add the style attribute to each of the image tags you want un-padded:

style="padding:0px"

ie. 

img src="http://www.artfagcity.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/pool8pulse.gif" alt="Tom Moody, Pulse Pool" style="padding:0px"

this way your other images will retain their proper distance from entry text and stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hasty in that response; a better solution might be to restore the css file to what it was, and then simply add the style attribute to each of the image tags you want un-padded:</p>
<p>style=&#8221;padding:0px&#8221;</p>
<p>ie. </p>
<p>img src=&#8221;http://www.artfagcity.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/pool8pulse.gif&#8221; alt=&#8221;Tom Moody, Pulse Pool&#8221; style=&#8221;padding:0px&#8221;</p>
<p>this way your other images will retain their proper distance from entry text and stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1557</link>
		<author>Art Fag City</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1557</guid>
					<description>cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom moody</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1558</link>
		<author>tom moody</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1558</guid>
					<description>Much appreciated, Paddy (and b.). I will try to live up to this during BLOG, the show, although I can't promise to curtail images of bouncy organic forms with spraycans. (It's a fine line between that and flying toasters but someone's got to go there.) Also, just so it's clear, the words in the Raad review are Saltz's, I didn't rewrite them. Except for taking out one qualifying phrase, I just stripped his review down to the damning paragraph buried in a longer piece purporting to praise Raad. I suppose that could be one-upmanship on my part--you had a line in there about it being macho and I didn't mind that you said that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much appreciated, Paddy (and b.). I will try to live up to this during BLOG, the show, although I can&#8217;t promise to curtail images of bouncy organic forms with spraycans. (It&#8217;s a fine line between that and flying toasters but someone&#8217;s got to go there.) Also, just so it&#8217;s clear, the words in the Raad review are Saltz&#8217;s, I didn&#8217;t rewrite them. Except for taking out one qualifying phrase, I just stripped his review down to the damning paragraph buried in a longer piece purporting to praise Raad. I suppose that could be one-upmanship on my part&#8211;you had a line in there about it being macho and I didn&#8217;t mind that you said that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1561</link>
		<author>Art Fag City</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1561</guid>
					<description>Re: Flying toasters. Hilarious!

I'll clarify the post visa vi the Saltz review since you are right, it does read as though you had changed his words.  

I still think the revision is a sort of a macho move, (which I rather like) but I removed the line because initially I had been thinking that the review was more than just one-upmanship on Saltz, but on Judd as well. After thinking about that some more I decided that wasn't the case so I removed the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Flying toasters. Hilarious!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll clarify the post visa vi the Saltz review since you are right, it does read as though you had changed his words.  </p>
<p>I still think the revision is a sort of a macho move, (which I rather like) but I removed the line because initially I had been thinking that the review was more than just one-upmanship on Saltz, but on Judd as well. After thinking about that some more I decided that wasn&#8217;t the case so I removed the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom moody</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1563</link>
		<author>tom moody</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1563</guid>
					<description>I thought you meant one-upmanship of Raad! I wasn't thinking about one-upping Saltz, just calling attention to the equivocating in his writing. I didn't so much distill or condense it as crop it--leaving only the rather devastating para about Raad without the touchy feely supportive paras that surrounded it.
As for trying to one-up Judd, fuggedaboutit. That was one tough unrelenting moFo who would not have survived one second in the current noodly art environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you meant one-upmanship of Raad! I wasn&#8217;t thinking about one-upping Saltz, just calling attention to the equivocating in his writing. I didn&#8217;t so much distill or condense it as crop it&#8211;leaving only the rather devastating para about Raad without the touchy feely supportive paras that surrounded it.<br />
As for trying to one-up Judd, fuggedaboutit. That was one tough unrelenting moFo who would not have survived one second in the current noodly art environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1564</link>
		<author>Art Fag City</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-1564</guid>
					<description>Well, I think you do one-up Saltz even if that was not your intention. I guess I'm speaking more about the inclination of artists to be highly critical of work, and the one-upmanship that exists within that activity as opposed to artists besting other artists. Raad's a good artist, but I don't see enough connections between your work for you to bother trying to one up that guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think you do one-up Saltz even if that was not your intention. I guess I&#8217;m speaking more about the inclination of artists to be highly critical of work, and the one-upmanship that exists within that activity as opposed to artists besting other artists. Raad&#8217;s a good artist, but I don&#8217;t see enough connections between your work for you to bother trying to one up that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom moody</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-2014</link>
		<author>tom moody</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/23/blog-for-sale/#comment-2014</guid>
					<description>The spaces are back in the pool GIFs! Also I just noticed yours is 4 GIFs and mine is 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spaces are back in the pool GIFs! Also I just noticed yours is 4 GIFs and mine is 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
