<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chelsea Gallery Crawl: Part Three of Three</title>
	<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/</link>
	<description>As relevant as Eric Fischl. New York art news, reviews and gossip.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1372</link>
		<author>Kurt</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1372</guid>
					<description>Beyond the irritating "painterly" formalism of a lot of the pictures, I think Gursky still has a knack for cutting to the quick in an interesting way. 

The fascist heart of precision showed through on the Formula 1 and North Korea pictures, and I thought the James Bond Island picture with the gods eye view of "hidden" coves was stunning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beyond the irritating &#8220;painterly&#8221; formalism of a lot of the pictures, I think Gursky still has a knack for cutting to the quick in an interesting way. </p>
<p>The fascist heart of precision showed through on the Formula 1 and North Korea pictures, and I thought the James Bond Island picture with the gods eye view of &#8220;hidden&#8221; coves was stunning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooky</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1373</link>
		<author>cooky</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1373</guid>
					<description>It seems as if he's relying on photoshop more and more as a crutch...It almost becomes a parody in my eyes when its all to obvoiusly a conglomeration of seamless stitching, as in those island pieces; I do agree with saltz, that each successive show has become staler, though the show is definitely as you point out worth seeing. What did you think about the sterling ruby show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as if he&#8217;s relying on photoshop more and more as a crutch&#8230;It almost becomes a parody in my eyes when its all to obvoiusly a conglomeration of seamless stitching, as in those island pieces; I do agree with saltz, that each successive show has become staler, though the show is definitely as you point out worth seeing. What did you think about the sterling ruby show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Fag City</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1390</link>
		<author>Art Fag City</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1390</guid>
					<description>Kurt: Agreed. There are absolutely images worth seeing the show and the James Bond Island pictures aren't bad. I don't mean to dismiss the work entirely, but I think its important to question formalism, even when it works. 

Cooky: Yeah, some of the photoshopping I like others I don't. The Island pictures don't bother me as much as they do you though. As for Sterling Ruby, I like the images on the Foxy website, but haven't seen the show yet. Maybe I'll write about it next week after I see some galleries this weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt: Agreed. There are absolutely images worth seeing the show and the James Bond Island pictures aren&#8217;t bad. I don&#8217;t mean to dismiss the work entirely, but I think its important to question formalism, even when it works. </p>
<p>Cooky: Yeah, some of the photoshopping I like others I don&#8217;t. The Island pictures don&#8217;t bother me as much as they do you though. As for Sterling Ruby, I like the images on the Foxy website, but haven&#8217;t seen the show yet. Maybe I&#8217;ll write about it next week after I see some galleries this weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Jagers &#187; Andreas Gursky @ Matthew Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1401</link>
		<author>Christopher Jagers &#187; Andreas Gursky @ Matthew Marks</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artfagcity.com/2007/05/17/chelsea-gallery-crawl-part-three-of-three/#comment-1401</guid>
					<description>[...] current photography show at Matthew Marks is getting dissed by many people, including Jerry Saltz, who I usually agree with. Above is a photo composite of a Formula 1 pit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] current photography show at Matthew Marks is getting dissed by many people, including Jerry Saltz, who I usually agree with. Above is a photo composite of a Formula 1 pit [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
