Reviewing the Reviews: Selling Himself and Prints Too at the NYTimes

by Art Fag City on April 11, 2007 · 11 comments Events

mcginness.jpg

Print available at The Lower Eastside Print Shop, (Artwork tip via: MAO), Ryan McGinness, Untitled (Blue Barbed Wire on White), 2007, screenprint, 48 x 32.25 inches image and sheet. Price: $3,000

Two days ago Allen Salkin wrote a piece for the New York Times titled Selling Himself and Prints Too, with the primary thesis that Pace Prints will build an additional location in Chelsea. I’m not sure why this should be so important that a two page article be written on the matter, particularly when what’s there reads like a giant advertisement for Pace Prints. According to the report, new comer Jacob Lewis convinced Pace Prints gallery owner Dick Solomon to make the move, and while Salkin doesn’t make explicit what rationale convinced Solomon, he does quote Lewis on the subject of the art market as saying, “for a couple of thousand bucks you can buy a print that may go up in value, rather than a purse or a pair of shoes that are just going to fall apart.”

I’ll believe that when I see it — I’m quite certain people buy the print AND the shoes — but that’s another post all together. This aside, the comment really serves to underscore the following: We should laud young Lewis as a genius who sold the “new” concept that prints not only have a market, but that that market is hip and fashionable. Lewis secures a solo show with artist Ryan McGinness for their inaugural opening as the epitome of all this, and the Times quotes Robin Cembalest at ArtNews on the subject who croons over the new director and the artist. “It’s a coup” she glows, and then runs down a list McGinness’s artist credentials.

McGinness isn’t a bad artist, but I don’t need to read about a show five months before its happened, especially since his mention serves only to re-enforce the idea of a trend setting collectors market. Probably the most annoying aspect of Selling Himself and Prints Too, reveals itself when Salkin presents the “opposing” view to the concept that print collecting is cool, managing to find some of the most inane commentary on the subject I’ve read. Says Helianthe Bourdeaux-Maurin, the associate director of the Williamsburg gallery Parker’s Box “Some people would rather spend $3,000 on a print by a big name than the same money on an emerging artist,” adding “Some people don't want to be edgy.”

Jesus. Clearly these people who aren’t collecting emerging artists are simply ball-less.

{ 10 comments }

Mark Stone April 11, 2007 at 5:48 pm

Great post Paddy! I am still surprised by the way a specific few galleries get to use the Times art section as their own personal advert section. Wonder what that entails? The other annoying thing about the article is the endless drone that keeps leveling art with any other product that’s for sale – shoes, televisions, prints etc. I understand the need to make a living, but this incessant professionalization makes my skin crawl. Keep up the good work!

Mark Stone April 11, 2007 at 1:48 pm

Great post Paddy! I am still surprised by the way a specific few galleries get to use the Times art section as their own personal advert section. Wonder what that entails? The other annoying thing about the article is the endless drone that keeps leveling art with any other product that’s for sale – shoes, televisions, prints etc. I understand the need to make a living, but this incessant professionalization makes my skin crawl. Keep up the good work!

Art Fag City April 11, 2007 at 8:26 pm

Yeah, I think that leveling has to do with presenting art as a luxury ticket item the same way that a designer shoe is one. I don’t find that so objectionable though. I think the idea that art has to have some higher function limits what it can be.

Art Fag City April 11, 2007 at 4:26 pm

Yeah, I think that leveling has to do with presenting art as a luxury ticket item the same way that a designer shoe is one. I don’t find that so objectionable though. I think the idea that art has to have some higher function limits what it can be.

Allen Salkin April 11, 2007 at 8:44 pm

Thanks for reading!

Allen Salkin April 11, 2007 at 4:44 pm

Thanks for reading!

Paul Pincus October 9, 2007 at 2:12 pm

Ryan McGinness might be a genius. When you have the Style Court set, the “Stealth Wealth” gang, major museums such a MOMA, AND maybe most importantly, the skateboarder set, clamoring for anything Ryan, well, you have something both relevant and important happening. The fact is that Ryan McGinness is a global cultural star (for good reason) and one who I suspect will have the haters in a frenzy for decades to come!

Paul Pincus October 9, 2007 at 10:12 am

Ryan McGinness might be a genius. When you have the Style Court set, the “Stealth Wealth” gang, major museums such a MOMA, AND maybe most importantly, the skateboarder set, clamoring for anything Ryan, well, you have something both relevant and important happening. The fact is that Ryan McGinness is a global cultural star (for good reason) and one who I suspect will have the haters in a frenzy for decades to come!

mr revs July 2, 2009 at 4:16 am

pincus, its two years later and ryan is still killing it. nice prediction!

mr revs July 1, 2009 at 11:16 pm

pincus, its two years later and ryan is still killing it. nice prediction!

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: